On 13/05/16 17:10 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
On 5/13/16 4:29 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/05/16 15:52 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
On 5/13/16 3:36 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 12/05/16 21:41 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
I have been of the same opinion as far as upgrades go.
I think
> On 14 May 2016, at 5:36 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>> On 5/12/16 9:20 PM, Sam Morrison wrote:
>>
>> We find glance registry quite useful. Have a central glance-registry api
>> is useful when you have multiple datacenters all with glance-apis and
>> talking back to a central registry serv
On 5/13/16 4:29 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 13/05/16 15:52 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/13/16 3:36 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>> On 12/05/16 21:41 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
I have been of the same opinion as far as upgrades go.
I think we are stepping ahead of o
On 13/05/16 15:52 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
On 5/13/16 3:36 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 12/05/16 21:41 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
I have been of the same opinion as far as upgrades go.
I think we are stepping ahead of ourselves here a bit. We need to
figure out
the rolling upgrade stor
On 5/13/16 3:36 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 12/05/16 21:41 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>> I have been of the same opinion as far as upgrades go.
>>
>> I think we are stepping ahead of ourselves here a bit. We need to
>> figure out
>> the rolling upgrade story first and see if registry is actu
On 12/05/16 21:41 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
I have been of the same opinion as far as upgrades go.
I think we are stepping ahead of ourselves here a bit. We need to figure out
the rolling upgrade story first and see if registry is actually useful or not
there as well.
I kinda disagree, tbh.
I have been of the same opinion as far as upgrades go.
I think we are stepping ahead of ourselves here a bit. We need to figure
out the rolling upgrade story first and see if registry is actually
useful or not there as well.
The feedback from operator sessions also indicated that some ops do use
