I've followed "cloud for at least as long as OpenStack has existed, but back
then I followed whatever/whoever called themselves "cloud" or
"cloud-{app|service|etc}" and at one point there was a heated discussion
(mostly that the rest of the group agreed with) that you couldn't claim you ran
in
I figure if you have entity Y's workloads running on entity X's hardware...
and that's 51% or greater portion of gross revenue... you are a public
cloud.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Kenny Johnston
wrote:
> That seems like a strange definition. It doesn't incorporate the usual
> multi-tenan
That seems like a strange definition. It doesn't incorporate the usual
multi-tenancy requirement that traditionally separates private from public
clouds. By that definition, Rackspace's Private Cloud offer, where we
design, deploy and operate a single-tenant cloud on behalf of customers (in
their d
Hi Blair
Agree with you on a lot of that stuff, although on lifecycle management we
certainly have a bunch of tooling in place to handle scenarios like initial
creation of user environments ( basic network and router setup ), freezing
resources for non-payment, offboarding of customers after accou
Hi Matt,
I think your dot points make sense. And yes, I was thinking about Science
Cloud overlap. I see Science Clouds as potentially sharing most or all of
these attributes (with the notable exception being charging in terms of end
users seeing a $ figure, showback and/or instance/cpu hour quotas
Hi Matt,
At considerable risk of heading down a rabbit hole... how are you defining
"public" cloud for these purposes?
Cheers,
Blair
Any cloud that provides a cloud to a thirdparty in exchange for money. So,
rent a VM, rent a collection of vms, lease a fully operational cloud spec'ed to
Hey Blair
Now you've done it ! OK, I'll bite and have a go at categorising that a bit
:
1. Multi-tenant - tenants need clear separation
2. Self service sign up - customers on board themselves
3. Some kind of charging model in place which requires resource accounting
4. API endpoints and possibly
Hi Matt,
At considerable risk of heading down a rabbit hole... how are you defining
"public" cloud for these purposes?
Cheers,
Blair
On 21 September 2016 at 18:14, Matt Jarvis
wrote:
> Given there are quite a few public cloud operators in Europe now, is there
> any interest in a public cloud g
suggestion on the
etherpad and let’s see what interest develops.
Thanks!
VW
From: Matt Jarvis
Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 3:14 AM
To: OpenStack Operators
Subject: [Openstack-operators] Public cloud operators group in Barcelona
Given there are quite a few public cloud operators in Europe
Given there are quite a few public cloud operators in Europe now, is there
any interest in a public cloud group meeting as part of the ops meetup in
Barcelona ? I already know many of you, but I think it could be very useful
to share our experiences with a wider group.
--
DataCentred Limited regi
10 matches
Mail list logo
