Re: [Openstack-operators] UC WG/Team Requirements

2017-07-13 Thread Melvin Hillsman
Totally agree with you Blair. I should have been more verbose in my explanation of sending this. We have UC elections coming up, rather important as everyone knows, being that the UC has gone from 3 appointed to 5 elected. We still have work to do re SIGs and have already taken a couple actions whi

Re: [Openstack-operators] UC WG/Team Requirements

2017-07-13 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Thanks for sharing Melvin, One major point here is that it's not clear how this proposal relates to the recent discussion around OpenStack SIGs. It's clear that more than a few of us are still struggling to understand intuitively why we are calling one thing a Working Group and another a Team, eve

[Openstack-operators] UC WG/Team Requirements

2017-07-12 Thread Melvin Hillsman
Hey everyone, Please take time today to offer any additional comments/questions/concerns to the following document - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r3KwaG-SbvaKCuAE52XwPCF7cRGDrNRg6dUhPQWs0vU This document establishes the requirements for current and future UC governed working groups and tea