Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

I'm open for suggestions to make this sound better. Thanks for this feedback. That's OK for me, +1 on the other comments in the thread. -- Vincent Legoll EGI FedCloud task force Cloud Computing at IdGC France Grilles / CNRS / IPHC ___ OpenStack-opera

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

All the different projects have different ways of reporting bugs and looking for features. You can see a few of the different ways that the Operators discussed back at the Summit here - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AUS-ops-Requests-for-Enhancement-Process That should give you some more contex

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

Ya, I'd like to make sure that whoever starts applying these messages to bugs automagically takes into account that people may (or may not have) spent a lot of (personal or other) time reporting a bug and take that into account when producing a polite and thankful message to those that have gon

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

Seems like a great approach. You might want to also include: This bug was probably not triaged due to lack of information to reproduce the issue. Please include as much information about the problem including steps to allow a developer to reproduce the issue in order for your time in reporting i

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

Minor, but "This bug report has been closed [...]" sounds much better than "This bug report got closed [...]" - Aubrey Wells Manager, Network Operations Digium Cloud Services Main: 888.305.3850 Support: 877.344.4861 or http://www.digium.com/en/support

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

On 27.05.2016 15:47, Vincent Legoll wrote: > Hello, > > Le 27/05/2016 15:25, Markus Zoeller a écrit : >> I don't see a benefit in leaving very old bug reports open when nobody >> is working on it (again, a resource problem). Closing it (with "Won't >> Fix") is explicit and easy to query. The infor

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

Hello, Le 27/05/2016 15:25, Markus Zoeller a écrit : I don't see a benefit in leaving very old bug reports open when nobody is working on it (again, a resource problem). Closing it (with "Won't Fix") is explicit and easy to query. The information is not lost. This does*not* mean we don't care a

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

Maybe a few more words on this ML *why* I'm doing this. It all comes down to a simple resource problem. Far more bug reports get filed than solved. For the last 3 releases the numbers [1][2][3] are: Kilo Liberty Mitaka Filed Bugs: 1144 926 968 Resolve