Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-community] User Survey - Deadline Feb 20th

2017-02-02 Thread Neil Jerram
I notice that at the end of the survey, when I click on the "SUBMIT YOUR SURVEY >" button, I just get the same page again, and so could click "SUBMIT YOUR SURVEY >" again, and so on... You might want to look at fixing that; and in the meantime, I hope that would not result in multiple copies of th

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-ansible] Remove compute node command

2017-02-02 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 2/1/2017 6:14 AM, Salman Toor wrote: hi, According to the Newton guide: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/openstack-ansible/newton/developer-docs/ops-remove-computehost.html The last command is # openstack-ansible remove_compute_node.yml -e node_to_be_removed=“compute1" With this I end

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-community] User Survey - Deadline Feb 20th

2017-02-02 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:12:25PM +, Neil Jerram wrote: :I notice that at the end of the survey, when I click on the "SUBMIT YOUR :SURVEY >" button, I just get the same page again, and so could click :"SUBMIT YOUR SURVEY >" again, and so on... : :You might want to look at fixing that; and in t

[Openstack-operators] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-02 Thread Jay Pipes
Hi, I was told about this group today. I have a few questions. Hopefully someone from this team can illuminate me with some answers. 1) What is the purpose of this group? The wiki states that the team "aims to define the use cases and identify and prioritise the requirements which are needed

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-02 Thread Edgar Magana
Jay, I am including the WG chairs to make sure they answers your questions and addresses your concerns. In Barcelona the UC asked exactly the same questions and recommended to the co-chairs of the LCOO WG to work with the existing WG to identify overlapping activities and either to work togeth

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-02 Thread Jay Pipes
On 02/02/2017 05:02 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: Jay, I am including the WG chairs to make sure they answers your questions and addresses your concerns. In Barcelona the UC asked exactly the same questions and recommended to the co-chairs of the LCOO WG to work with the existing WG to identify over

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-02 Thread Sun, Yih Leong
LCOO was initiated by a group of large telco who contributes/uses OpenStack, such as AT&T, NTT, Reliance Jio, Orange, etc [1]. The co-chair has reached out to Product WG for collaboration (refer IRC meeting logs). The team is working on plans to structure/define LCOO use cases. Use case requi

Re: [Openstack-operators] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-02 Thread Curtis
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Hi, > > I was told about this group today. I have a few questions. Hopefully someone > from this team can illuminate me with some answers. > > 1) What is the purpose of this group? The wiki states that the team "aims to > define the use cases and

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-community] OpenStack Summit Boston-CFP closes February 6th

2017-02-02 Thread Sam P
Hi Erin, Thank you for the reminder and other info. In you previous mail, > Panels are allowed a total of four speakers plus one moderator, whereas > presentations and lightning talks are limited to two speakers. To the best of my knowledge, presentations limited to three speakers. Not sure