Re: [opensuse] cardbus PCI adaptor

2007-08-07 Thread Tim Nicholson
Rajko M. wrote: On Monday 06 August 2007 10:01:45 am Tim Nicholson wrote: I have bought a cheapo cardbus to PCI adaptor for my desktop system running 10.1 so I can use some memory cards that I share with the laptop. Kinfo centre lists the adaptor in the PCI section, and an inserted memory card

[opensuse] cardbus PCI adaptor

2007-08-06 Thread Tim Nicholson
is easily recognised when plugged into a cardbus to USB adaptor. IS there anyway to set up the cardbus adaptor to hot plug like it would in a laptop, or via the USB adaptor? Thanks for any help. -- Tim Nicholson http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain

[opensuse] HT://dig in 10.1

2007-04-12 Thread Tim Nicholson
anyone else come across this one? -- Tim Nicholson http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use

Re: [opensuse] Thunderbird spam filter

2007-03-22 Thread Tim Nicholson
James Knott wrote: Tim Nicholson wrote: One of the things that annoys me everytime I upgrade is having to make the new version of thunderbird learn what is spam. Does anyone know which file its ruleset is kept in so I can copy it across to new installs? That sort of thing should be stored

Re: [opensuse] Thunderbird spam filter

2007-03-22 Thread Tim Nicholson
Gilles Durys wrote: Tim Nicholson wrote: Does anyone know which file its ruleset is kept in so I can copy it across to new installs? I believe it's training.dat located in your thunderbird profile. Thanks! Not the sort of filename I expected, but I can see the logic now! -- Tim http

[opensuse] Thunderbird spam filter

2007-03-21 Thread Tim Nicholson
One of the things that annoys me everytime I upgrade is having to make the new version of thunderbird learn what is spam. Does anyone know which file its ruleset is kept in so I can copy it across to new installs? -- Tim http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential

[opensuse] Changing Remote Administration screen resolution

2007-03-07 Thread Tim Nicholson
in the above file, (default is disabled) opened 5902 in the firewall, and restarted X. However I cannot connect to my server on 5902 (5901 works fine). Anyone know what bit I have missed? -- Tim Nicholson http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain

[opensuse] KDM login screen configuration

2007-03-07 Thread Tim Nicholson
al though I have a server with a number of user accounts with desktop login disabled, they still appear in the list of accounts at the KDM login screen. What I would really like is to be able to disable this list completely so that no hint is given as to the valid users on the system. Having

Re: [opensuse] KDM login screen configuration

2007-03-07 Thread Tim Nicholson
jim barnes wrote: On Wednesday 07 March 2007 11:19, Tim Nicholson wrote: Having trawled through yast I cannot see any way to do this, nor can I find a KDM config file to tweak. The tweak is in /opt/kde3/share/config/kdm/kdmrc, along with a plethora of others: # Enable user list (names

[opensuse] More Software updater issues

2006-12-05 Thread Tim Nicholson
as if the troublesome machine has a duff installed apps database or something, the question is how to fix it? -- Tim Nicholson http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have

Re: [opensuse] Pear on 10.1

2006-11-16 Thread Tim Nicholson
Scott Leighton wrote: On Wednesday 15 November 2006 5:38 am, Tim Nicholson wrote: I'm experiencing problems with pear on 10.1 and wonder if anyone else has had problems? PHP Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 8208 bytes) in. Anybody any

[opensuse] Pear on 10.1

2006-11-15 Thread Tim Nicholson
exhausted (tried to allocate 8208 bytes) in. depending on the call, the tried to allocate amount varies but the allowed size is constant. Some calls also have other warnings such as:- Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() Anybody any ideas? -- Tim Nicholson http://www.bbc.co.uk