Mike Coan wrote:
On Friday 19 October 2007 02:07:49 pm Richard Creighton wrote:
Richard,
Thanks so much for your persistence. I did in fact try it in two stages,
No problem ... glad it worked out
raid 5 array that SMART finally indicated the drive was bad.
A long time ago I
On Thursday 18 October 2007 04:26:15 pm Richard Creighton wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for the reply. i am indeed using software RAID, not any RAID
included with the motherboard. Your configuration is much more
complicated than mine, and your RAID 5 is much larger than mine, so no
reason mine
On Friday 19 October 2007 02:07:49 pm Richard Creighton wrote:
Mike Coan wrote:
when the installation fails and I reboot and begin a new installation, I
note that disks 3 and 4 are labeled md0, but disk 2 is not. perhaps it
is a problem with disk 2. My next attempt will try to create a
I am in the process of building a new server for our small business.
The current server is running opensuse 10.2 and has 4 SATA I drives. The
first drive has /swap, /boot (ext2 50 MB) and /storage (reiserfs 75 GB).
then there are 3 80GB drives as md0 in a raid5 configuration with reiserfs.
Mike Coan wrote:
I am in the process of building a new server for our small business.
The current server is running opensuse 10.2 and has 4 SATA I drives. The
first drive has /swap, /boot (ext2 50 MB) and /storage (reiserfs 75 GB).
then there are 3 80GB drives as md0 in a raid5
Richard,
On Thursday 18 October 2007 03:19:07 pm Richard Creighton wrote:
{stuff deleted}
Doing a clean install of opensuse 10.3. Again the first drive is /swap
(2 GB) /boot (/ext2 50MB) and /storage (ext3 300GB or so). Drives 2-4
are md0 (460GB ext3) intended to be /
As Yast is
On Thursday 18 October 2007 04:26:15 pm Richard Creighton wrote:
{stuff deleted}
Doing a clean install of opensuse 10.3. Again the first drive is /swap
(2 GB) /boot (/ext2 50MB) and /storage (ext3 300GB or so). Drives 2-4
are md0 (460GB ext3) intended to be /
As Yast is
On Thursday 18 October 2007 04:40:00 pm Richard Creighton wrote:
Mike Coan wrote:
Thanks for the reply. i am indeed using software RAID, not any RAID
included with the motherboard. Your configuration is much more
complicated than mine, and your RAID 5 is much larger than mine, so no
Mike Coan wrote:
On Thursday 18 October 2007 04:40:00 pm Richard Creighton wrote:
Mike Coan wrote:
Thanks for the reply. i am indeed using software RAID, not any RAID
included with the motherboard. Your configuration is much more
complicated than mine, and your RAID 5 is much
