On Friday 02 June 2006 20:16, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:08:48PM -0200, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> > If Ubuntu Dapper & Knoppix solved that issue - I *really* wish the
> > same for SUSE 10.2.
>
> Our Promo DVD offers Live + Install. Don't know if we have it ready yet.
I've b
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 09:16:29PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:08:48PM -0200, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> > If Ubuntu Dapper & Knoppix solved that issue - I *really* wish the
> > same for SUSE 10.2.
>
> Our Promo DVD offers Live + Install. Don't know if we have it ready
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:08:48PM -0200, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> If Ubuntu Dapper & Knoppix solved that issue - I *really* wish the
> same for SUSE 10.2.
Our Promo DVD offers Live + Install. Don't know if we have it ready yet.
Ciao, Marcus
--
If Ubuntu Dapper & Knoppix solved that issue - I *really* wish the
same for SUSE 10.2.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an addon tip to this thread:
I prefered to download and install the whole SuSE 10.1 DVD (3.5 GB),
because my previous bad experience with all too slow download speed
trying Internet installation during the beta period.
I've also downloaded the Ubuntu Dapper Drake 6.0.6 beta DVD iso (2.5GB),
wh
Am Freitag, 2. Juni 2006 14:15 schrieb Alexey Eremenko:
> 3) make a single compressed image that contains all software (like
> Knoppix) that can also be installable.
When the rpm database is included, it would be the same as a basic
installation, software could be uninstalled and updated like in
On 6/2/06, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Francis Giannaros wrote:
> That version has an option to install? (doesn't say that there).
In fact, I had always the feeling that the 10.0 live was
installable, but there was then so many options (eval...)
that I may be wrong :-(
sorry
jdd
The curre
Francis Giannaros wrote:
That version has an option to install? (doesn't say that there).
In fact, I had always the feeling that the 10.0 live was
installable, but there was then so many options (eval...)
that I may be wrong :-(
sorry
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_
On Friday 02 June 2006 12:42, jdd wrote:
> seems like the live dvd used to be installable:
>
> http://www.novell.com/products/suselinux/downloads/ftp/mirrors_isos.html
>
> is that nor more the case? what was the reason to change that?
>
> thanks
> jdd
That version has an option to install? (doesn'
Hi,
Alexey Eremenko schrieb:
> 2) Better yet - develop some kind of technology that can take
> installed RPMs and convert them back to installtion RPMs.
This technology already exists (rpm --repackage option).
Andreas Hanke
-
T
On 6/2/06, Marcus Rueckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-06-02 13:29:02 +0200, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> LiveDVD works but - poorly - I'm not satisfied with it.
>
> 1) UnionFS will enable us, users - to install software even when
> running from ROM media - such as a DVD-ROM.
that sounds stup
seems like the live dvd used to be installable:
http://www.novell.com/products/suselinux/downloads/ftp/mirrors_isos.html
is that nor more the case? what was the reason to change that?
thanks
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
h
On 2006-06-02 13:29:02 +0200, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> LiveDVD works but - poorly - I'm not satisfied with it.
>
> 1) UnionFS will enable us, users - to install software even when
> running from ROM media - such as a DVD-ROM.
that sounds stupid. unless you have tons of ram to waste. :)
> 2) I do
the livedvd seems to work no?
why do you think it is bad? can you give facts?
so far i would say: "because unionFS sounds leet"
for proper discussions you should provide reasons for your statements.
thanks in advance
darix
Hi Darix !
LiveDVD works but - poorly - I'm not satisfied with it
On 2006-06-02 04:31:39 -0200, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> I am *very* interested in creation of such a DVD. (Live+Install) with
> UnionFS technology - currently SUSE LiveDVD is extremely bad and does
> not include UnionFS.
the livedvd seems to work no?
why do you think it is bad? can you give facts?
I am *very* interested in creation of such a DVD. (Live+Install) with
UnionFS technology - currently SUSE LiveDVD is extremely bad and does
not include UnionFS.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
Jeremy Figgins wrote:
A very useful case would be to check h/w compatibility. I often have
family and friends who have very old, very corrupted installations of
Win98/WinMe on P2/P3 class hardware. All they want to do is surf the web
and write emails - if I could easily check that the h/w is co
A very useful case would be to check h/w compatibility. I often have
family and friends who have very old, very corrupted installations of
Win98/WinMe on P2/P3 class hardware. All they want to do is surf the web
and write emails - if I could easily check that the h/w is compatible
and install o
Seems like these days more distributions are adopting the Live Installer
method as an option as a quick-and-easy install. Obviously there are many
advantages to this, and some scenarios that it avoids.
For example, never tried out Linux and want to try SUSE Linux? Sure, there's a
completely pai
19 matches
Mail list logo
