On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Walt Frampus wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 05:36 +0200, houghi wrote:
Oh, please do, because people already talk about wther they should use
SUSE or openSUSE and they talk as if openSUSE is the distro, not just the
comunity. And that is also how I personally feel
On Monday 10 October 2005 09:54, Martin Sommer wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Walt Frampus wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 05:36 +0200, houghi wrote:
Oh, please do, because people already talk about wther they should use
SUSE or openSUSE and they talk as if openSUSE is the distro, not just
Monday 10 Oct 2005 13:33 samaye Jan Karjalainen alekhiit:
Maybe naming it LE, which could stand for Limited Edition or Light Edition?
Ye Gods who make SUSE, note the support for my suggestion! See
my post of 10-10-2005 13:29 UTC+0530 under the thread Eval version of Suse
Linux 10.0.
I think the naming (in many areas) could have been done better by
Novell and openSUSE.
The last thing you want is to have people confused about your product.
It is mostly due to inconsistent naming and usage, and it must be
fixed for future releases.
1. Why introduce a release version of GM
Monday 10 Oct 2005 08:11 samaye Peter Flodin alekhiit:
1. Why introduce a release version of GM when the roadmap calls it
Final?
IIRC nobody ever thought that GM is a release version. Gold Master is in the
optical disc industry parlance the name of the final release version of a
product.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 12:41:32PM +1000, Peter Flodin wrote:
I think the naming (in many areas) could have been done better by
Novell and openSUSE.
Hear, hear !!
The last thing you want is to have people confused about your product.
It is mostly due to inconsistent naming and usage, and
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 05:36 +0200, houghi wrote:
Oh, please do, because people already talk about wther they should use
SUSE or openSUSE and they talk as if openSUSE is the distro, not just the
comunity. And that is also how I personally feel it. I am part of a
comunity that drives the
