S Glasoe wrote:
> Nope. Single instance of a single 9.3 install upgraded to 10.2 totally
> trashed /boot/grub/menu.lst.
That was the release notes copied verbatim. I don't know why they
mention multiple instance, but when you update the kernel, it creates a
multiple instance situation, as it app
On Thursday 15 March 2007 09:01:05 am Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> S Glasoe wrote:
> > Watch out for the kernel 2.6.18.8-0.1 update either during or post
> > update/upgrade. Known issue is that /boot/grub/menu.lst is being
> > changed in ways that are not always user friendly. I advise making
> > back
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-14 13:53]:
>
> for example. upgrade from SuSE 10.2 to 13.0 ?
cool, where can I get 13.0? I'd very interested, because then I can
relax next two year until we release 13.0 ... :)
Regards,
Bernhard
pgp8w83qXDb6C.pgp
Description: PGP signature
S Glasoe wrote:
> Watch out for the kernel 2.6.18.8-0.1 update either during or post
> update/upgrade. Known issue is that /boot/grub/menu.lst is being changed in
> ways that are not always user friendly. I advise making backups
> of /boot/grub/menu.lst to /etc/or /home/some-user before doing th
S Glasoe wrote:
> Watch out for the kernel 2.6.18.8-0.1 update either during or post
> update/upgrade. Known issue is that /boot/grub/menu.lst is being changed in
> ways that are not always user friendly. I advise making backups
> of /boot/grub/menu.lst to /etc/or /home/some-user before doing th
On Thursday 15 March 2007 07:56:46 am Philippe Andersson wrote:
> Richard Bos wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:11:46PM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> >> The Wednesday 2007-03-14 at 08:57 -0400, Abstract wrote:
> >>
> >> I upgraded from 9.3 to 10.2, via the install dvd.
> >
> > And me too :)
>
>
Richard Bos wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:11:46PM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> The Wednesday 2007-03-14 at 08:57 -0400, Abstract wrote:
>>
>> I upgraded from 9.3 to 10.2, via the install dvd.
>
> And me too :)
>
I'm planning to do just that "real soon now" on several boxen (laptop,
desktop
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:11:46PM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> The Wednesday 2007-03-14 at 08:57 -0400, Abstract wrote:
>
> > I know in the past I heard you could not upgrade suse major
> > revision upgrades, just minor.
>
> Rubish!
>
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2007-03-14 at 08:57 -0400, Abstract wrote:
> I know in the past I heard you could not upgrade suse major
> revision upgrades, just minor.
Rubish!
I upgraded from 9.3 to 10.2, via the install dvd.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
--
On Thu 15 Mar 2007 02:05, Bob S wrote:
> Don't know about now, but way back when, I upgraded 8.0 to
> 8.1 with apt-get. Just changed my source files from 8.0 to 8.1 and
> let it go. Worked pretty well but there were things that had to be
> fixed.
>
> Would be interesting to know if it can still b
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 08:57, Abstract wrote:
> Adding to that, can smart or any other package manager be used
> instead? I know in the past I heard you could not upgrade suse major
> revision upgrades, just minor.
>
> -rami
>
> On 3/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - c
Adding to that, can smart or any other package manager be used
instead? I know in the past I heard you could not upgrade suse major
revision upgrades, just minor.
-rami
On 3/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- can yast be used to upgrade Distribution ?
for example. upgra
- can yast be used to upgrade Distribution ?
for example. upgrade from SuSE 10.2 to 13.0 ?
thanks
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
