[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...]
> I read a lot about kernel updates in this list, but I still have the
> following (understanding?) problem:
>
> When I install a new kernel from on of the repositories
>
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/Vanilla/openSUSE_10.3/
> or
> http://dow
Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 08:11:37PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I read a lot about kernel updates in this list, but I still have the
>> following (understanding?) problem:
>>
>> When I install a new kernel from on of the repositories
>>
>> http://download
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 08:11:37PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I read a lot about kernel updates in this list, but I still have the
> following (understanding?) problem:
>
> When I install a new kernel from on of the repositories
>
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Ker
On Sunday 30 December 2007 01:11:37 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I read a lot about kernel updates in this list, but I still have the
> following (understanding?) problem:
>
> When I install a new kernel from on of the repositories
>
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/V
Hello!
I read a lot about kernel updates in this list, but I still have the
following (understanding?) problem:
When I install a new kernel from on of the repositories
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/Vanilla/openSUSE_10.3/
or
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/HE
Not only grub but also lilo is being effected, that is if you are using
lilo and lilo.conf look at my lilo.conf. good think I saw it before I
reboot the system (SuSE 10.2):
# Modified by YaST2. Last modification on Thu Nov 8 09:15:38 EST 2007
menu-scheme = Wb:kw:Wb:Wb
timeout = 600
lba32
chang
On Thursday 08 November 2007 21:54:06 Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> > Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >> On Thursday 08 November 2007 13:20, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>>
> What is causing this and how can I fix it?
> >>>
> >>> What is in /boot/grub/devices.map ? Is /dev/sdb l
Randall R Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Every installation of a kernel, including the 10.2 -> 10.3 upgrade, the
> first available and today's kernel updates have put entries like these
> in my GRUB menu.lst file (note the "root(...)" directives):
>
> -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> Randall R Schulz wrote:
>> On Thursday 08 November 2007 13:20, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>>> ...
What is causing this and how can I fix it?
>>> What is in /boot/grub/devices.map ? Is /dev/sdb listed there as hd0?
>> 2635# pwd
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Thursday 08 November 2007 13:20, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>> ...
>>> What is causing this and how can I fix it?
>> What is in /boot/grub/devices.map ? Is /dev/sdb listed there as hd0?
>
> 2635# pwd
> /boot/grub
> 2636#
> 263
On Thursday 08 November 2007 13:20, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> ...
> >
> > What is causing this and how can I fix it?
>
> What is in /boot/grub/devices.map ? Is /dev/sdb listed there as hd0?
2635# pwd
/boot/grub
2636#
2636# ll
total 312
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10 2007-03-05 12:13 default
-rw-
>
> Don't understand that. I updated a friend's couple of hours back and
> his drives are identified by the other scheem, (hd1,4).
>
> --
> Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
I am with Patrick. Every since update / upgrade of the Kernel i've done since
1
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 01:01:53PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Every installation of a kernel, including the 10.2 -> 10.3 upgrade, the
> first available and today's kernel updates have put entries like these
> in my GRUB menu.lst file (note the "root(...)" directives):
>
> -==--==-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-08-07 16:03]:
> -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==-
> ###Don't change this comment - YaST2 identifier: Original name: linux###
> title openSUSE 10.3 - 2.6.22.12-0.1
> root (/de
Hi,
Every installation of a kernel, including the 10.2 -> 10.3 upgrade, the
first available and today's kernel updates have put entries like these
in my GRUB menu.lst file (note the "root(...)" directives):
-==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==-
###Don't change this co
On Aug 29 2007 14:00, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>> > Or you could use 10.2 plus a 3rd-party 2.6.22. Webpin will tell.
>>
>> Webpin? I found http://benjiweber.co.uk:8080/webpin/
>>
>> Is that what you mean? What 3rd party kernel package does all the other
>> things needed to go from 2.6.13 to 2.6.2
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 14:00 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> You can use the 2.6.22 kernel from 10.3 on 10.2. Only thing affected is likely
> udev/hal.
Seems like a big 'only thing' :)
--
Roger Oberholtzer
OPQ Systems / Ramböll RST
Ramböll Sverige AB
Kapellgränd 7
P.O. Box 4205
SE-102 65 Stoc
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:58:51PM +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 12:48 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Aug 29 2007 08:09, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> > >On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 18:28 -0500, Rajko M. wrote:
> > >
> > >> I would rather install on another partition Beta 2 or
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 12:48 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Aug 29 2007 08:09, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> >On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 18:28 -0500, Rajko M. wrote:
> >
> >> I would rather install on another partition Beta 2 or wait few days for
> >> Beta3
> >> (Sept. 6th). That way you get all softwa
On Aug 29 2007 08:09, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
>On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 18:28 -0500, Rajko M. wrote:
>
>> I would rather install on another partition Beta 2 or wait few days for
>> Beta3
>> (Sept. 6th). That way you get all software updated and if it doesn't work
>> well, there is good old 10.0 i
On 8/29/07, Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 18:28 -0500, Rajko M. wrote:
>
> > I would rather install on another partition Beta 2 or wait few days for
> > Beta3
> > (Sept. 6th). That way you get all software updated and if it doesn't work
> > well, there is goo
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 18:28 -0500, Rajko M. wrote:
> I would rather install on another partition Beta 2 or wait few days for Beta3
> (Sept. 6th). That way you get all software updated and if it doesn't work
> well, there is good old 10.0 installation.
We are planning our SUSE release support f
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 22:21 +0100, Thomas Hertweck wrote:
> Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> > I know that this is a topic that gets endless questions. Perhaps because
> > a mistake can be so problematic. Here goes mine:
> >
> > I am running an openSUSE 10.0 system with kernel 2.6.13-15.16-default.
> >
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 04:21:16 pm Thomas Hertweck wrote:
> Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> > I know that this is a topic that gets endless questions. Perhaps because
> > a mistake can be so problematic. Here goes mine:
> >
> > I am running an openSUSE 10.0 system with kernel 2.6.13-15.16-default.
>
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> I know that this is a topic that gets endless questions. Perhaps because
> a mistake can be so problematic. Here goes mine:
>
> I am running an openSUSE 10.0 system with kernel 2.6.13-15.16-default.
> This is a rather recent security-fixed kernel. But still the 2.6.13 t
Hello
I know that this is a topic that gets endless questions. Perhaps because
a mistake can be so problematic. Here goes mine:
I am running an openSUSE 10.0 system with kernel 2.6.13-15.16-default.
This is a rather recent security-fixed kernel. But still the 2.6.13 that
came with 10.0.
I am loo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-04-16 at 10:40 +0200, Morten Bjørnsvik wrote:
> Disks today are so big that there are very few reasons to
> keep tiny /boot partitions so you can't manage several
> kernels around.
Yes, on new systems. An older one will have smaller
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 19:19 +0100, Thomas Hertweck wrote:
> Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > [...]
> > All other distros do the same as far as I know.
> > Care to give an example where this is not the case?
>
> My Fedora system does not remove old kernels when a kernel update is
> installed via yum, the
Marcus Meissner wrote:
> [...]
> All other distros do the same as far as I know.
> Care to give an example where this is not the case?
My Fedora system does not remove old kernels when a kernel update is
installed via yum, the default software management tool. It just adds
a new entry in the boot
|-Original Message-
|From: Marcus Meissner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Well, "rpm -i" of the kernel works for openSUSE 10.2 and SLES
|10 too in this regard.
|
|What does Redhats automated updater do?
|
I was unsure so I tested it on a not updated system with default
up2date config:
(I
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:40:54AM +0200, Morten Bjørnsvik wrote:
> |From: Marcus Meissner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |All other distros do the same as far as I know.
> |Care to give an example where this is not the case?
>
> On our RHEL production systems we download the kernel
> and then insta
|From: Marcus Meissner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|All other distros do the same as far as I know.
|Care to give an example where this is not the case?
On our RHEL production systems we download the kernel
and then install them via 'rpm -i '
Then it leaves both kernels bootable via grub.
The new "
On 2007/04/16 07:32 (GMT+0200) Marcus Meissner apparently typed:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 04:46:08PM -0700, STDIN wrote:
>> Why are previous kernels deleted from the system when doing a kernel update?
>> I know of no other distro that has that behavior. I'd think you'd want to
>> have the old
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 04:46:08PM -0700, STDIN wrote:
> Why are previous kernels deleted from the system when doing a kernel update?
> I know of no other distro that has that behavior. I'd think you'd want to
> have the old kernel available in case the update bombs or doesnt work
> properly.
* Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-15-07 22:00]:
> The Sunday 2007-04-15 at 20:14 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > I don't know how you are doing it, but on my system I have to remove
> > the older kernels/sources. There are t many.
>
> Yast does as he describes, has always done so as f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Sunday 2007-04-15 at 20:14 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> I don't know how you are doing it, but on my system I have to remove
> the older kernels/sources. There are t many.
Yast does as he describes, has always done so as far as I rememb
STDIN wrote:
> Why are previous kernels deleted from the system when doing a kernel update?
> I know of no other distro that has that behavior. I'd think you'd want to
> have the old kernel available in case the update bombs or doesnt work
> properly.
>
> When doing a kernel update and getting
* STDIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-15-07 19:48]:
> Why are previous kernels deleted from the system when doing a kernel
> update? I know of no other distro that has that behavior. I'd think
> you'd want to have the old kernel available in case the update bombs
> or doesnt work properly.
>
> When
Why are previous kernels deleted from the system when doing a kernel update?
I know of no other distro that has that behavior. I'd think you'd want to
have the old kernel available in case the update bombs or doesnt work
properly.
When doing a kernel update and getting the new source its also
Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 15:35 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/i386/HEAD has only the
>> > kernel package, no kernel-source package (which I will need for ATi
>> > drivers and the like).
>>
>> That should get
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 15:35 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/i386/HEAD has only the
> > kernel package, no kernel-source package (which I will need for ATi
> > drivers and the like).
>
> That should get changed IMO.
Which, the URL/content, or the fact
Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I haven't had to do this in ages, and with Mantel gone, I'm not sure
> where to find "official unofficial" kernels for SUSE.
>
> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/i386/HEAD has only the
> kernel package, no kernel-source package
Hi guys,
I haven't had to do this in ages, and with Mantel gone, I'm not sure
where to find "official unofficial" kernels for SUSE.
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/i386/HEAD has only the
kernel package, no kernel-source package (which I will need for ATi
drivers and the like).
And
43 matches
Mail list logo
