James Hatridge wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the best mirror in Germany (or Europe) for down loading 10.2?
It might be University of Kent. I usually use mirror.switch.ch, but
I've seen some impressive download rates (+500kb/s) from UofKent.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ -
Hi all,
What is the best mirror in Germany (or Europe) for down loading 10.2?
Thanks,
JIM
--
Jim Hatridge
Linux User #88484
Ebay ID: WartHogBulletin
--
WartHog Bulletin
Info about new German Stamps
http://www.WartHogBulleti
What is the best mirror in Germany (or Europe) for down loading 10.2?
The best for me is usually BitTorrent. Add it into KTorrent and a
couple hours later, it's done... a good chance to experiment with it
now that you're on ADSL :-)
As for best mirror... it seems to vary, but I get great speed
On 2006-08-31 17:02:39 -0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:56:14AM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > JFYI download.opensuse.org and software.opensuse.org are doing
> > redirecting to mirrors aswell.
>
> Why redirect instead of CNAME?
because not all servers match our paths.
an
Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:56:14AM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
>> JFYI download.opensuse.org and software.opensuse.org are doing
>> redirecting to mirrors aswell.
>
> Why redirect instead of CNAME?
1. It allows the redirector to check beforehand if a given file
is on a mi
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:56:14AM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> JFYI download.opensuse.org and software.opensuse.org are doing
> redirecting to mirrors aswell.
Why redirect instead of CNAME?
Thanks
pgpMwy5SHVoT8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hi,
JFYI download.opensuse.org and software.opensuse.org are doing
redirecting to mirrors aswell.
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
-
Hello,
I thought you might be interested in the Metalinks for openSUSE, which are
automatically generated by one of your mirrors (http://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/)
at http://download.packages.ro/metalink/opensuse/.
Metalinks are really useful for large files like ISOs and contain all mirror
and p2p loc
th, about a misguided
ego-trip, and more believable than blaming the mirror
maintainers.
> and the mirrormaintainers not wanting to mirror
> the same quite large repo twice (i.e. having inst-
> source on both ftp.suse.com and opensuse.
Not needed if handled properly. On the openSUSE
mirr
mirrors to the inst-sources on opensuse-mirrors. Not sure if it's technically
> possible.
I doubt it. There are places that mirror with different subdirectory
structures.
> > OpenSUSE should be reserved for
> > working on the next SUSE release, and the
> > finished
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:01:11PM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Hey, don't hold your breath, I'm "working" on migrating my RPMs over
> to Packman since almost a year ;)
> Not trivial to move 6 GB of packages.
Burn them on 2 DVD's and mail them if transfering 6GB of data is too much.
;-D
houghi
-
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 15:01 +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> frank nelson wrote:
> > --- Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> >> And by the way - Guru and Packman are working on a
> >> merger. That'll make things
> >> a little bit simpler.
> >
> > At least that makes sense.
>
> Hey,
Well, a combination of wanting to show off our openess - and the
mirrormaintainers not wanting to mirror the same quite large repo twice (i.e.
having inst-source on both ftp.suse.com and opensuse.
Maybe another idea could be to have some kind of link from the ftp.suse.com
mirrors to the inst-source
frank nelson wrote:
> --- Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> And by the way - Guru and Packman are working on a
>> merger. That'll make things
>> a little bit simpler.
>
> At least that makes sense.
Hey, don't hold your breath, I'm "working" on migrating my RPMs over
to Packman
--- Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the standard oss installation source
> (freeze of factory) will be on
> openSUSE mirrors. And Extra, KDE-update, Misc, etc.
> will be on ftp.suse.com-mirrors. I agree that it
> would be nice to have inst-sour
ws, we don't need this current
> > silliness to continue, after going back to a single OS name.
>
> I believe the standard oss installation source (freeze of factory) will be on
> openSUSE mirrors. And Extra, KDE-update, Misc, etc. will be on
> ftp.suse.com-mirrors. I agree
the standard oss installation source (freeze of factory) will be on
openSUSE mirrors. And Extra, KDE-update, Misc, etc. will be on
ftp.suse.com-mirrors. I agree that it would be nice to have inst-source on
ftp.suse.com-mirrors too.
Guess it's a matter of how much the mirror-people will put
Once 10.1 final is released, are all the installation
sources, as well as the ISOs going to be available on
the regular SUSE mirrors, like they were with 9.3? God
knows they should be. Having two sets of mirrors to
install different parts of a basic SUSE Linux
installation is just plain silly. It's
On 03/09/2006 01:31 AM Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> The "i386" directory level just should fade away. It is not true, it is
> misleading, it just has no place there.
ACK.
OJ
--
`But he knows your dad was right all along now about Voldemort being
back -? `Dumbledore says people find it far easi
On 03/08/2006 03:53 PM houghi wrote:
> Again a proposal:
> ftp.suse.com could hold everything. It can hold the OSS content, as it is
> part of SUSE. It can also hold the NON OSS content, as it will do any way.
> It has much more mirrors. It can hold everything.
>
> So because it can hold everythi
Hi,
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg schrieb:
[compat symlinks for everything except 9.0 and 9.1]
So 9.0 and 9.1 still need the "old" tree.
So we have two problems at hand:
* 9.0 and 9.1 need the "old" tree -> 9.0 ist discontinued, 9.1 will
be disconti
Hi,
Eberhard Moenkeberg schrieb:
>
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Siegbert Baude wrote:
>
>> Christoph Thiel schrieb:
>>
>>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Andreas Stieger wrote:
>
* on many mirrors, x86_64 packages are found somewhere under i386
>>
>>> I guess what you are referring to is the fact that we sh
Hi,
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Siegbert Baude wrote:
Christoph Thiel schrieb:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Andreas Stieger wrote:
* on many mirrors, x86_64 packages are found somewhere under i386
I guess what you are referring to is the fact that we share the update
trees with our bi- or even tri-arch pr
Christoph Thiel schrieb:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Andreas Stieger wrote:
* on many mirrors, x86_64 packages are found somewhere under i386
I guess what you are referring to is the fact that we share the update
trees with our bi- or even tri-arch products and those trees are located
in pub/suse/
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:20:58AM +0100, Christoph Thiel wrote:
> It's already possible today to do a minimal installation with CD1 and a
> default GNOME / KDE installation with CD 1-3. Maybe we need to make this
> more visible within our Beta/RC announcements. We are of course
> very much inte
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Andreas Stieger wrote:
> In the status meeting, on the topic of mirrors, I pointed out that our
> local mirror admin was confused about SUSE and openSUSE.
>
> I was asked to cite the relevant parts of the thread as an example.
>
> He basically points out:
> * ISOs are too bi
Op dinsdag 7 maart 2006 19:21, schreef Andreas Stieger:
> In the status meeting, on the topic of mirrors, I pointed out that our
> local mirror admin was confused about SUSE and openSUSE.
>
> I was asked to cite the relevant parts of the thread as an example.
>
> He basically points out:
> * ISOs a
In the status meeting, on the topic of mirrors, I pointed out that our
local mirror admin was confused about SUSE and openSUSE.
I was asked to cite the relevant parts of the thread as an example.
He basically points out:
* ISOs are too big, users will download all 5 when they could have
done an
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:45:06AM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> -avv includes the whole subtree.
Thanks,
rsync -avv --dry-run rsync.opensuse.org::opensuse-full
sent 85 bytes received 747348 bytes 12153.38 bytes/sec
total size is 61555814788 speedup is 82356.30
Still some ready informa
Hi,
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, houghi wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 08:49:38AM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
That way people can decide easier what and what not to mirror.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:4 08:35:28 /mirr/bin > du -s /pub/opensuse/distribution/*
Using `du -sh` might be more readable. ;-)
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 08:49:38AM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> >That way people can decide easier what and what not to mirror.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:4 08:35:28 /mirr/bin > du -s /pub/opensuse/distribution/*
Using `du -sh` might be more readable. ;-)
> You can run "rsync -vv --dry-run"
Hi,
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, houghi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:14:33PM -0700, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
The above link is where I had them look and then they requested a guess
for the amount of space that is needed. I tried to guess about 60 GB
combined (per release for both ftp.suse.com and
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:14:33PM -0700, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> The above link is where I had them look and then they requested a guess
> for the amount of space that is needed. I tried to guess about 60 GB
> combined (per release for both ftp.suse.com and ftp.opensuse.org).
> With all the
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, houghi wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 05:34:55PM -0700, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> > They are considering it but want to know exactly how much space is needed.
> > With the sponsership of storage array they would be willing to mirror any
> > and all of ftp.opensuse.org and f
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 05:34:55PM -0700, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> They are considering it but want to know exactly how much space is needed.
> With the sponsership of storage array they would be willing to mirror any
> and all of ftp.opensuse.org and ftp.suse.com.
First point them to http://e
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, houghi wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:38:08AM -0700, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> > take a look at mirror.xmission.com
> > They do have a suse directory but it is way out of date. You will not
> > that debian and slackware are upto date. I would like to know if I should
>
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:38:08AM -0700, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> take a look at mirror.xmission.com
>
> They do have a suse directory but it is way out of date. You will not
> that debian and slackware are upto date. I would like to know if I should
> contact them. They are a very reliable
Hello,
There are major problems with the US mirrors. To get the security updates
I had to try all the mirrors to get them all. I have found that I must
manaully run the update using all US mirrors to get all the patches. I
have done this 2-3 days after the announcement. I would expect all
38 matches
Mail list logo
