Hi all -
I just tried to install 10.3beta2 (the KDE CD iso) on my 64bit machine.
The
first steps worked until the installation set-up. But when I check the
suggested partitioning it recognises my IDE disk as an /dev/sda and the menu
in the partitioner also says it is a scsi disk. Checki
On 8/24/07, Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007/08/24 20:18 (GMT+0200) Carlos E. R. apparently typed:
>
> > Friday 2007-08-24 at 13:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> On 2007/08/24 14:41 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:
>
> >> > "Carlos E. R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:29:56PM +0200, Günter Lichtenberg wrote:
> Hi all -
> I just tried to install 10.3beta2 (the KDE CD iso) on my 64bit machine.
> The
> first steps worked until the installation set-up. But when I check the
> suggested partitioning it recognises my IDE disk as an /
On 2007/08/23 22:29 (GMT+0200) Günter Lichtenberg apparently typed:
> I just tried to install 10.3beta2 (the KDE CD iso) on my 64bit machine.
> The
> first steps worked until the installation set-up. But when I check the
> suggested partitioning it recognises my IDE disk as an /dev/sda an
On Thursday 23 August 2007 23:05, Felix Miata wrote:
> > The question is: Is this a real bug or a feature? I always thought that
> > IDE disks should be on hda devices.
>
> Traditional ATA drivers have been replaced by libata drivers in latest
> kernels. Libata treats all devices it handles as SCSI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Thursday 2007-08-23 at 22:34 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> It is a feature. hda is ... mostly history.
>
> We now use libata for IDE drives which is a SCSI based library.
Is there any hope of increasing the 16 partition limit some time in the
"Carlos E. R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Thursday 2007-08-23 at 22:34 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
>> It is a feature. hda is ... mostly history.
>>
>> We now use libata for IDE drives which is a SCSI based library.
>
> Is there any hope of increasing the 16 partition limit some time i
"Carlos E. R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Friday 2007-08-24 at 14:41 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
>> > Is there any hope of increasing the 16 partition limit some time in the
>> > future?
>>
>> No - but we added a workaround for this. If you have more than 16
>> partitions, just give i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-08-24 at 14:41 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Is there any hope of increasing the 16 partition limit some time in the
> > future?
>
> No - but we added a workaround for this. If you have more than 16
> partitions, just give it a
On 2007/08/24 14:41 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:
> "Carlos E. R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is there any hope of increasing the 16 partition limit some time in the
>> future?
> No -
Because it's a kernel design issue, something SUSE/Novell has little or no
control over.
>
On 2007/08/24 15:18 (GMT0200) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:
> "Carlos E. R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Question: Can 10.2 coexist in the same PC with 10.3 beta? Regarding this
>> problem, I mean.
> It should - Hannes, can you comment?
Dunno why Carlos should ask. I have 4-5 systems wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-08-24 at 13:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2007/08/24 14:41 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:
>
> > "Carlos E. R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Is there any hope of increasing the 16 partition limit some time in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-08-24 at 13:51 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2007/08/24 15:18 (GMT0200) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:
>
> > "Carlos E. R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Question: Can 10.2 coexist in the same PC with 10.3 beta? Regarding th
* Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-24-07 14:20]:
> Well, they can assign developers to scsi and develop patches that add
> support for more than 16 partitions to scsi modules. If technically
> possible, of course (I don't know what is the origin of that limit).
> Or invent something different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-08-24 at 15:04 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Carlos E. R. [08-24-07 14:20]:
> > Well, they can assign developers to scsi and develop patches that add
> > support for more than 16 partitions to scsi modules. If technically
> >
On 2007/08/24 14:18 (GMT-0400) Carlos E. R. apparently typed:
> Friday 2007-08-24 at 13:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> A related issue is optional mounts. When exist upwards of 30 lines in fstab,
>> with labels or worse for partition identification, it's a new and large
>> headache to figure out
On 2007/08/24 20:46 (GMT+0200) Carlos E. R. apparently typed:
> Friday 2007-08-24 at 13:51 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> On 2007/08/24 15:18 (GMT0200) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:
>> > "Carlos E. R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> Question: Can 10.2 coexist in the same PC with 10.3 beta?
On 2007/08/24 20:18 (GMT+0200) Carlos E. R. apparently typed:
> Friday 2007-08-24 at 13:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> On 2007/08/24 14:41 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:
>> > "Carlos E. R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> Is there any hope of increasing the 16 partition limit so
* Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-24-07 15:42]:
[...]
> But... aren't channels the devices connected to the same cable (bus)? Ugh,
> just looked it up in the wikipedia and there is no mention of what
> "channels" are.
as usual, this came to mind after posting. The moment of greatest
reve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-08-24 at 15:42 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2007/08/24 14:18 (GMT-0400) Carlos E. R. apparently typed:
>
> > Friday 2007-08-24 at 13:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> A related issue is optional mounts. When exist upwards of 30
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-08-24 at 16:31 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> >> Because it's a kernel design issue, something SUSE/Novell has little or no
> >> control over.
>
> > Well, they can assign developers to scsi and develop patches that add
> > support for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-08-24 at 17:07 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Carlos E. R. [08-24-07 15:42]:
> [...]
> > But... aren't channels the devices connected to the same cable (bus)? Ugh,
> > just looked it up in the wikipedia and there is no mention
22 matches
Mail list logo
