Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
I send and receive lots of e-mails which contain equations. I just
prepare them using any equation editor and paste them as pictures in
my HTML e-mail. So I raise my both hands ;)
Note that you can send images without using HTML. Just make
Carlos E. R. wrote:
I send and receive lots of e-mails which contain equations. I just prepare
them using any equation editor and paste them as pictures in my HTML e-mail.
So I raise my both hands ;)
Good enough reason, for you :-)
Paifull way of working on the other sides of the planet.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Saturday 2007-01-06 at 12:24 +0400, Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
Read this, then correct your signature:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature_block
I read it, thank you, but that didn't answer my question. So what should I do,
create a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Saturday 2007-01-06 at 12:42 +0400, Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
Good enough reason, for you :-)
Paifull way of working on the other sides of the planet. Friend, who I'm
working with, each time makes that all calculations by hand then scan it
Hi Carlos!
Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Saturday 2007-01-06 at 12:42 +0400, Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
Paifull way of working on the other sides of the planet. Friend, who I'm
working with, each time makes that all calculations by hand then scan it and
send it to me as pdf. Slow process...
He could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Sunday 2007-01-07 at 00:21 +0400, Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
He could use a graphic format as png. Ah, have a look at the djvu format: it
is designed for scanned material, not as pdf. The problem is creation, not
simple.
Will drop that
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 23:51 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Sunday 2007-01-07 at 00:21 +0400, Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
He could use a graphic format as png. Ah, have a look at the djvu format:
it
is designed for scanned material, not
Ah, yes, some scanner programs (specially in windows) produce pdf
output directly, making them simple to generate. maybe it is possible
to do the same in Linux.
xsane = 0.98 can do single page pdf. xsane = 0.99 can do multi-paged
pdf prjects.
Charles
--
printk(KERN_CRIT PFX Reboot didn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Saturday 2007-01-06 at 18:11 -0500, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
It is possible using the latest versions of xsane. It allows you to
automatically save the doc to a file and pdf is one of the formats
supported.
You are right, the version in 10.1
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 14:55 -0500, James Knott wrote:
Michael Nelson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:55:42AM -0500, Mike McMullin wrote:
Perhaps I'm in the minority here, but I bit bucket HTML e-mails coming
into this account as soon as I see them, unread.
I do too. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-01-05 at 01:55 -0500, Mike McMullin wrote:
Perhaps I'm in the minority here, but I bit bucket HTML e-mails coming
into this account as soon as I see them, unread.
That's an overkill.
I agree that sending html to this list (and
Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Thursday 04 January 2007 22:31, Mike McMullin wrote:
...
Please don't ever send someone or anyone you might like, HTML
e-mail.
Why not? Typographic variation is an age-old aspect of textual
expression. There's no good reason to eschew it. Why should
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:55:42AM -0500, Mike McMullin wrote:
Perhaps I'm in the minority here, but I bit bucket HTML e-mails coming
into this account as soon as I see them, unread.
I do too. I figure if someone is clueless enough to send HTML mail, the
content is unlikely to be of
On 2007/01/05 07:11 (GMT-0800) Randall R Schulz apparently typed:
On Friday 05 January 2007 04:33, Joachim Schrod wrote:
Because HTML emails tend to be much larger (again, not all of are on
broadband all of the time).
Can you quantify that? 'Cause I don't believe that a few font variations
On Friday 05 January 2007 07:32, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2007/01/05 07:11 (GMT-0800) Randall R Schulz apparently typed:
On Friday 05 January 2007 04:33, Joachim Schrod wrote:
Because HTML emails tend to be much larger (again, not all of are
on broadband all of the time).
Can you quantify
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 12:38 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-01-05 at 01:55 -0500, Mike McMullin wrote:
Perhaps I'm in the minority here, but I bit bucket HTML e-mails coming
into this account as soon as I see them, unread.
Randall R Schulz wrote:
I say, HTML mail is OK.
I say, ban all HTML in e-mail messages.
Everyone who agrees, raise your arm. Everyone who disagrees, raise both
arms. Then count and enforce the result... ;-)
--
Geir A. Myrestrand
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
I say, HTML mail is OK.
I say, ban all HTML in e-mail messages.
Everyone who agrees, raise your arm. Everyone who disagrees, raise both
arms. Then count and enforce the result... ;-)
I send and receive lots of e-mails which contain
Michael Nelson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:55:42AM -0500, Mike McMullin wrote:
Perhaps I'm in the minority here, but I bit bucket HTML e-mails coming
into this account as soon as I see them, unread.
I do too. I figure if someone is clueless enough to send HTML mail, the
Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
I say, HTML mail is OK.
I say, ban all HTML in e-mail messages.
Everyone who agrees, raise your arm. Everyone who disagrees, raise
both arms. Then count and enforce the result... ;-)
I send and receive lots of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-01-05 at 15:46 -0500, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
I send and receive lots of e-mails which contain equations. I just prepare
them using any equation editor and paste them as pictures in my HTML e-mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-01-05 at 23:42 +0400, Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
I say, ban all HTML in e-mail messages.
Mmmm what about freedom of choice?
Everyone who agrees, raise your arm. Everyone who disagrees, raise both
arms. Then count and enforce
On 2007/01/06 02:08 (GMT+0100) Carlos E. R. apparently typed:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-01-05 at 23:42 +0400, Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
I say, ban all HTML in e-mail messages.
Mmmm what about freedom of choice?
Exactly how does one choose to never
On Friday 05 January 2007 17:15, Felix Miata wrote:
...
Exactly how does one choose to never receive any HTML email, or for
that matter, never to receive email littered with useless PGP junk to
a mailing list?
I suppose that whatever it is, it's the same way I would choose not to
receive
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 05:45:53PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
I suppose that whatever it is, it's the same way I would choose not to
receive useless and offensive bible quotations via a mailing list.
Please sign me up for that one!
--
If a kid asks where rain comes from, I think a cute
Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-01-05 at 23:42 +0400, Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
I say, ban all HTML in e-mail messages.
Mmmm what about freedom of choice?
Everyone who agrees, raise your arm. Everyone who disagrees, raise both
arms.
Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-01-05 at 15:46 -0500, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
Sergey Mkrtchyan wrote:
I send and receive lots of e-mails which contain equations. I just prepare
them using any equation editor and paste them as pictures in
On Friday 05 January 2007 20:02, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Web sites use html. Nobody tells them to use plain text. Html is not evil
per se. Use of html by evil people can be evil. That's different.
You might be right However
When they switched over to opensuse as a mail server from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-01-05 at 21:11 -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Friday 05 January 2007 20:02, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Web sites use html. Nobody tells them to use plain text. Html is not evil
per se. Use of html by evil people can be evil. That's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-01-05 at 21:06 -0500, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
Note that you can send images without using HTML. Just make
references to the attached images if necessary. There are also
document formats you can use for this that will
Michael Nelson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 05:45:53PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
I suppose that whatever it is, it's the same way I would choose not to
receive useless and offensive bible quotations via a mailing list.
Please sign me up for that one!
And me.
--
To
This is an attempt to anser the problem of sending to the list - I keep getting
denied posting. This is written with the HTML option disabled.
winstephen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 14:29 -0800, StephenW wrote:
This is an attempt to anser the problem of sending to the list - I keep
getting
denied posting. This is written with the HTML option disabled.
Please don't ever send someone or anyone you might like, HTML e-mail.
--
To unsubscribe,
On Thursday 04 January 2007 22:31, Mike McMullin wrote:
...
Please don't ever send someone or anyone you might like, HTML
e-mail.
Why not? Typographic variation is an age-old aspect of textual
expression. There's no good reason to eschew it. Why should we be stuck
in the 1970s when it
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 22:45 -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Thursday 04 January 2007 22:31, Mike McMullin wrote:
...
Please don't ever send someone or anyone you might like, HTML
e-mail.
Why not? Typographic variation is an age-old aspect of textual
expression. There's no good
35 matches
Mail list logo
