Mike Diehl wrote:
[top-posting stupidity moved to bottom]
On Saturday 19 January 2008 10:10:32 am Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Saturday 2008-01-19 at 08:48 -0800, PerfectReign wrote:
On Sat, January 19, 2008 7:11 am, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:18:51 -0800 (PST), PerfectReign
Am Samstag, 19. Januar 2008 17:48:34 schrieb PerfectReign:
My apologies. I forgot that you can thread emails on KMail.
I have it turned off. I do the same in KNode and Pan, but forgot you
can thread in email.
It's not just Kmail :)
it is actually a standard and part of RFC 822: 4.6.1 4.6.2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Saturday 2008-01-19 at 08:48 -0800, PerfectReign wrote:
On Sat, January 19, 2008 7:11 am, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:18:51 -0800 (PST), PerfectReign wrote:
This is email. There is no thread.
Either you simply forgot a
I find it interesting that there were more responses on the topic of email
threading than there were for the original question.
I'll bet we get about 4 more posts because I top-posted. Can't we cut each
other some slack?
On Saturday 19 January 2008 10:10:32 am Carlos E. R. wrote:
The
On Saturday 19 January 2008 06:21:14 pm Mike Diehl wrote:
I find it interesting that there were more responses on the topic of email
threading than there were for the original question.
I'll bet we get about 4 more posts because I top-posted. Can't we cut each
other some slack?
We can, but
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 20:54 -0600, Rajko M. wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2008 06:21:14 pm Mike Diehl wrote:
I find it interesting that there were more responses on the topic of email
threading than there were for the original question.
I'll bet we get about 4 more posts because I
Interesting.
I don't have accessibility needs (if you don't count slow typing).
I just imagined that sorted mail in thread and text in chronological order
will make use of audio screen readers easier. Though, now I know that it is
easier to have last mail at the top and just jump from one
