Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

> >You're right: I get a conflict warning. Now here's my example, where I didn't >get one. I have used a different version of ib_core.ko. Maybe it is dependent >on what kind of files are being packed? >%files >%defattr(-, root, root) >/lib/modules/2.6.16.13-4-smp/kernel/drivers/infiniband/core/i

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 12:15 +0200, Oliver Tennert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 10:23 schrieb jdd: > > Oliver Tennert wrote: > > > Good morning, > > > > > > the lack of reaction gives me the impression that not everyone on this > > > list fully grasps the implication of the new RPM behaviou

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 12:55 schrieb Jan Engelhardt: > dumb.spec: > > Name: dumb-a > Version:0 > Release:0 > License:WTFPL > Summary:Foo > Group: What > BuildRoot: %_tmppath/%name-%version-%build > > %description > > %install > mkdir -p

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 13:17 schrieb jdd: > Oliver Tennert wrote: > > For God's sake, this is getting tedious. Let the discussion please > > continue on any other mailing list if you are getting bored here because > > it's accidentally not about community life, use, fun and psycho > > problem

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Oliver Tennert wrote: For God's sake, this is getting tedious. Let the discussion please continue on any other mailing list if you are getting bored here because it's accidentally not about community life, use, fun and psycho problems... why can't YOU go to the others mailing lists I have quo

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 12:41 schrieb jdd: > Oliver Tennert wrote: > > I think it is an issue relevant enough to be discussed here, because this > > is the place where the _real_ SUSE discussions are, don't you agree? > > I don't agree. For now this list is for discussion about > community use

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

>> > >> > In fact it seems that the problem lies somewhere in your configuration. >> > Consider the following transcript which I have just obtained: >> > >>> lots of rpm A rather 'dated' system (updated over time, orig install was 8.2): 12:51 shanghai:../RPMS/noarch # rpm -Uhv dumb-a-0-0.noarch.r

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Oliver Tennert wrote: I think it is an issue relevant enough to be discussed here, because this is the place where the _real_ SUSE discussions are, don't you agree? I don't agree. For now this list is for discussion about community use and life, not at all for technical discussion. If you d

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

On Thursday 22 June 2006 12:19, Oliver Tennert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 10:57 schrieb Alexander S. Usov: > > On Thursday 22 June 2006 10:04, Oliver Tennert wrote: > > > > > > In fact it seems that the problem lies somewhere in your configuration. > > Consider the following transcript w

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Hi, On Thursday, June 22, 2006 at 12:15:07, Oliver Tennert wrote: > You must be joking. I have just had a look at the archives of suse-linux-e > and > suddenly remembered why it was that I quit posting to it: 95% [SPAM]. The spam in the archives comes from ezmlm archive injection. They went n

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 10:57 schrieb Alexander S. Usov: > On Thursday 22 June 2006 10:04, Oliver Tennert wrote: > > In fact it seems that the problem lies somewhere in your configuration. > Consider the following transcript which I have just obtained: > > ~ > sd rpm -Uvh --replacefiles --rep

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 10:23 schrieb jdd: > Oliver Tennert wrote: > > Good morning, > > > > the lack of reaction gives me the impression that not everyone on this > > list fully grasps the implication of the new RPM behaviour. > > I don't think this list is the appropriate place to discuss >

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:42:51AM +0200, Oliver Tennert wrote: > Please be aware that I am not blaming SUSE & Co. for it, this is a RedHat & > Co. invention. It is just that SUSE (as far as I can see it) seems not to be > aware of this. Maybe it's a bug in the tagged fileindex patch. I'll have

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

On Thursday 22 June 2006 10:04, Oliver Tennert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 10:00 schrieb Klaus Kaempf: > > * Oliver Tennert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jun 22. 2006 09:47]: > > > Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 09:45 schrieb Klaus Kaempf: > > > > * Oliver Tennert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jun 22. 2006

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Oliver Tennert wrote: Good morning, the lack of reaction gives me the impression that not everyone on this list fully grasps the implication of the new RPM behaviour. I don't think this list is the appropriate place to discuss this. You should try suse-linux-e if this rpm package is alread

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 10:00 schrieb Klaus Kaempf: > * Oliver Tennert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jun 22. 2006 09:47]: > > Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 09:45 schrieb Klaus Kaempf: > > > * Oliver Tennert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jun 22. 2006 09:43]: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root # rpm -ihv --fileconfli

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

* Oliver Tennert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jun 22. 2006 09:47]: > Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 09:45 schrieb Klaus Kaempf: > > * Oliver Tennert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jun 22. 2006 09:43]: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root # rpm -ihv --fileconflicts > > > fileconflictstest-1.0-1.x86_64.rpm > > > Preparing...

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 09:45 schrieb Klaus Kaempf: > * Oliver Tennert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jun 22. 2006 09:43]: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root # rpm -ihv --fileconflicts > > fileconflictstest-1.0-1.x86_64.rpm > > Preparing...### > > [100%]

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

* Oliver Tennert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jun 22. 2006 09:43]: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root # rpm -ihv --fileconflicts > fileconflictstest-1.0-1.x86_64.rpm > Preparing...### [100%] >1:fileconflictstest #

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts --RELOADED

Good morning, the lack of reaction gives me the impression that not everyone on this list fully grasps the implication of the new RPM behaviour. I (actually a colleague of mine) have construed a simple RPM package "fileconflictstest" which has an example file in it, in this case a kernel modul

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts

Am Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 16:01 schrieb Robert Schiele: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Oliver Tennert wrote: > > Hello, > > > > do I understand it right that since RPM 4.3 or so file conflicts when > > installing several RPMs are not shown anymore but ignored? > > No. > > If so, the m

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts

Am Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 16:01 schrieb Michael Schroeder: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Oliver Tennert wrote: > > do I understand it right that since RPM 4.3 or so file conflicts when > > installing several RPMs are not shown anymore but ignored? > > No, there's no change in the fil

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Oliver Tennert wrote: > Hello, > > do I understand it right that since RPM 4.3 or so file conflicts when > installing several RPMs are not shown anymore but ignored? No. > If so, the man page of RPM says nothing whatsoever of the change in > behaviour,

Re: [opensuse] RPM 4.4 and file conflicts

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Oliver Tennert wrote: > do I understand it right that since RPM 4.3 or so file conflicts when > installing several RPMs are not shown anymore but ignored? No, there's no change in the file conflict handling. Why do you think there is? Cheers, Michael.