On Friday 21 April 2006 04:06, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> I have most of my machines with only 128 M or 256
> M memory.
Something I just wanted to report. Yast became very memory hungry. I
didn't notice in the first betas I tried as I had 1GB memory, but due
to a module failure now I have onl
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 07:06:04PM -0600, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> The package manangement at such a late time
> frame in release cycle leaves me really uneasy.
Yes, and it has also been explained why that was done. Dragging it on and
on does nobody any good. Nobody likes it. The decision has b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On Thursday 20 April 2006 22:10, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> > > Perhaps I'm just whining or venting some steam, but the aggressive
> > > release-schedule isn't doing me much good.
> >
> > I too am very concerned about this and agree 1000%. I wonder t
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:36:01AM +0200, Martin Schlander wrote:
> Other than too much new immature stuff has been put in,
> if SUSE Linux is supposed to be a nice stable distro in it's own right - and
> not just a SLED test platform.
I don't think it is 'just' a SLED test platform, I think it
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 06:13:48PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I don't think a two week schedule makes any sense either - I suspect
> it is primarily a result of excess energy generated by the advent
> of openSUSE. Give it a year and the schedule will cool off to something
> more sensible like once
On Thursday 20 April 2006 22:10, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm just whining or venting some steam, but the aggressive
> > release-schedule isn't doing me much good.
>
> I too am very concerned about this and agree 1000%. I wonder the same
> thing. I do not want to complain but I have re
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 21:01 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> Perhaps I'm just whining or venting some steam, but the aggressive
> release-schedule isn't doing me much good.
I don't think a two week schedule makes any sense either - I suspect
it is primarily a result of excess energy generated by the ad
On Thursday 20 April 2006 16:10, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> > I can't help noticing a bit of a problem. With a very aggressive
> > release-schedule such as "every 2 weeks", chances of genuine bugs being
> >
> > 1) reported,
> > 2) diagnosed and
> > 3) fixed
> >
> > in that timeframe are very minima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I can't help noticing a bit of a problem. With a very aggressive
> release-schedule such as "every 2 weeks", chances of genuine bugs being
>
> 1) reported,
> 2) diagnosed and
> 3) fixed
>
> in that timeframe are very minimal.
This is my greatest fe
I can't help noticing a bit of a problem. With a very aggressive
release-schedule such as "every 2 weeks", chances of genuine bugs being
1) reported,
2) diagnosed and
3) fixed
in that timeframe are very minimal.
When I say "genuine" I discount typos, apparmor bureacrazy, and other
minors t
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 06:25:49PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> "mchouinard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thursday 20 April 2006 09:59, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >>
> >> To assure best quality for SUSE Linux 10.1 we will offer RC 2 at
> >> openSUSE.org by end of this week.
> > friday or s
"mchouinard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 20 April 2006 09:59, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>
>> To assure best quality for SUSE Linux 10.1 we will offer RC 2 at
>> openSUSE.org by end of this week.
> friday or saturday?
We'll see :-(
>> We made major progress in the area of product upda
On Thursday 20 April 2006 09:59, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> To assure best quality for SUSE Linux 10.1 we will offer RC 2 at
> openSUSE.org by end of this week.
friday or saturday?
> We made major progress in the area of product updates and patch
> management and invite everybody to test RC2 heavi
13 matches
Mail list logo
