The Nice Spider wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Volker Kuhlmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
>> In your example, you could write
>>
>> FW_SERVICES_EXT_TCP="
>> 80
>> 443
>> 21
>> "
>>
>> or
>>
>> FW_SERVICES_EXT_TCP=
>> FW_SERVICES_EXT_TCP="$FW_SERVICES_EXT_TCP 80"
>> FW_SERVICES_EXT_TC
Hello,
rsync-ed this morning, I wanted to install factory on PPC. It does not work:
*** Starting YaST2 ***
Error loading language plugin /usr/lib/YaST2/plugin/lybpy2lang_perl.so:
libsqlite2.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
No such client module installation
Run 'ya
Lukas Ocilka wrote:
> The Nice Spider wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Volker Kuhlmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ...
>>> In your example, you could write
>>>
>>> FW_SERVICES_EXT_TCP="
>>> 80
>>> 443
>>> 21
>>> "
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> FW_SERVICES_EXT_TCP=
>>> FW_SERVICES_EXT_TCP="$FW_SERV
I have remove some packages from suse 10.1 , and create
suse/setup/descr/packages file. How to parse this file to find the indenpency
problem?
Hello Peter,
> rsync-ed this morning, I wanted to install factory on PPC. It does not work:
>
> *** Starting YaST2 ***
> Error loading language plugin /usr/lib/YaST2/plugin/lybpy2lang_perl.so:
> libsqlite2.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> No such client module ins
Hello,
Holger Sickenberg írta:
>> rsync-ed this morning, I wanted to install factory on PPC. It does not work:
>>
>> *** Starting YaST2 ***
>> Error loading language plugin /usr/lib/YaST2/plugin/lybpy2lang_perl.so:
>> libsqlite2.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>> No
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all:
I try to upgrade my system and see that if I update m4 from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED],smart delete my autoconf [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
because is related with the old m4 version.I can't see any new autoconf
on factory directory...
Is it
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 04:43:59PM +0200, Chema Ollés wrote:
> I try to upgrade my system and see that if I update m4 from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED],smart delete my autoconf [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> because is related with the old m4 version.I can't see any new autoconf
> on factory di
On 2006-07-24 17:06:24 +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:06:24 +0200
> From: Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [opensuse-factory] updating m4 package from factory
> To: opensuse-factory@opensuse.org
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 04:43:59PM +0200, Chema Ollés wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcus Rueckert escribió:
> Imho this design is stupid. but you can use:
>
> smart --shell
> upgrade
>
> and than issue "keep package" for all packages you want to keep
>
Hi:
Yes I know I can lock m4 version or autoconf version,but when the new
aut
Stephan Kulow kirjoitti:
> Am Samstag, 22. Juli 2006 15:32 schrieb Arto Viitanen:
>
>> I did install kdebase3-debuginfo-3.5.3-13.i586.rpm and
>> kdelibs3-debuginfo-3.5.3-15.i586.rpm from
>> http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/
>> i586/.
>>
>> Output of the
Am Montag, 24. Juli 2006 20:02 schrieb Arto Viitanen:
> Stephan Kulow kirjoitti:
> > Am Samstag, 22. Juli 2006 15:32 schrieb Arto Viitanen:
> >> I did install kdebase3-debuginfo-3.5.3-13.i586.rpm and
> >> kdelibs3-debuginfo-3.5.3-15.i586.rpm from
> >>
> >> http://download.opensuse.org/distribution
Hi,
I'm currently a little bit disappointed of
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192743
and its duplicate
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193996
which is caused by a broken YOU for SUSE Linux 10.0.
The background and a fix are available at
http://people.opera.com/eddy/Y
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:09:06PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > ... So the core question is: Is it a
> > valid state, that packages in factory can be inconsistend?
>
> smart tries by design to get the very latest of everything. Even if it
> means to remove some packages that rely on older ver
Hi,
Joerg Mayer schrieb:
> You are pointing fingers to *symptoms*, while I try to find out about
> the underlying cause. The core problem is not that smart handles some
> things in a suboptimal way (your opinion) *in the case the repo is
> inconsistent*.
To answer your question: Factory is not gu
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:27:33AM +0200, Andreas Hanke wrote:
> To answer your question: Factory is not guaranteed to be always consistent.
Good.
> See also: http://en.opensuse.org/Factory
>
> For example, it can happen that a package is updated in such a way that
> dependent packages have to b
16 matches
Mail list logo