> > There is no _need_ to do so. It is just an extra level of safety to do
> > regular checks to detect inconsistencies as early as possible. This is
> > like doing backups: You don't _have_ to do them but it is generally
> > considered a wise choice to do so.
> >> that something might be wrong,
> You are expecting things from opensuse-updater that it doesn't do.
> opensuse-updater does _not_ update every package to the most recent
> version; it installs patches only (like the old SUSEwatcher did), so new
> packages are pulled in only if they are part of a patch. The factory
> tree does no
Alex schrieb:
> As a KDE user I have now once more trashed zmd and rug and want to use
> opensuse-updater and libzypp direct. Version of opensuse-updater is 3.16,
> libzypp and zypper are installed.
>
> 1. When configuring the applet, I just have the option to choose
> between "Novell ZENWorks"
As a KDE user I have now once more trashed zmd and rug and want to use
opensuse-updater and libzypp direct. Version of opensuse-updater is 3.16,
libzypp and zypper are installed.
1. When configuring the applet, I just have the option to choose
between "Novell ZENWorks" and "Default". Where is l
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 01:23 +0100, Stephan Binner wrote:
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 21:29, Jim Pye wrote:
>
> > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215688
> > Please add your vote to this bug
>
> Care to enlighten me about the sense to vote for a fixed bug?
>
> Bye,
>Steve
Steve
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:30:45PM +0100, Frederic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Where's located the factory-extra tree?
You can find that stuff on ftp.suse.com and it's mirrors, not on the
opensuse.org servers. If you want to know the reason you can subscribe to
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?i
Hello,
Where's located the factory-extra tree?
Frédéric
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:07:13PM +0100, Alex wrote:
I'm not a file system specialist and I don't want to become one, but why on
earth has a file system in the 21st century to perform time consuming
checks - with absolutely no other reasons for t
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:07:13PM +0100, Alex wrote:
> I'm not a file system specialist and I don't want to become one, but why on
> earth has a file system in the 21st century to perform time consuming
> checks - with absolutely no other reasons for this behaviour apart from the
> fact that th
> > This is frighteningly true, here are 2 suggestions,
> > we probably need them both.
> > 1) While an fsck is occurring in non-verbose startup mode
> > we need a message to that effect with a progress bar.
> > 2) On shutdown; if a routine fsck WOULD happen next reboot,
> > the OS asks if
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:24:48PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > That does much of what Novell currently does with Nvidia. Novell pushes
> > all of the burden of support, distribution, and legal issues onto
> > Nvidia.
>
> Which brings us back to the question of what Novell's position is fo
> That does much of what Novell currently does with Nvidia. Novell pushes
> all of the burden of support, distribution, and legal issues onto
> Nvidia.
Which brings us back to the question of what Novell's position is for
openSUSE compared with their position for SLE.
> So again, Ubuntu is movin
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:55:50PM +, Francis Giannaros wrote:
> To address a point made earlier:
>
> Greg KH wrote:
> > Both of these are third party packages, Ubuntu was forced to stop
> > shipping their pre-built packages a while ago for the obvious legal
> > reasons.
>
> That's not true a
Martin,
On Friday 03 November 2006 08:04, Martin Schlander wrote:
> Fredag 03 november 2006 16:15 skrev Randall R Schulz:
> > What is this thing, anyway?
>
> Where have you been for the last 7 months?
Avoiding and ignoring all the brouhaha about the SNAFUs in 10.1, what do
you think?
> Here yo
Andreas,
On Friday 03 November 2006 07:47, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> ...
>
> > Won't you fix this constant running? Surely that cannot be normal
> > operation, can it? At this point, it has run up 340 minutes of CPU
> > time. What's it doing with this interminable activity?
>
> This is a bug - so, p
Fredag 03 november 2006 16:15 skrev Randall R Schulz:
> What is this thing, anyway?
Where have you been for the last 7 months?
Here you can see the different parts of the packagemanagement in default
10.1+10.2
http://en.opensuse.org/Image:Package-management-in-code10.png
And here is how it look
Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas,
>
> On Friday 03 November 2006 07:07, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Fredag 03 november 2006 15:16 skrev Andreas Jaeger:
>> >> > 1) Is zmd slated for replacement before 10.2 final arrives?
>> >>
>>
Andreas,
On Friday 03 November 2006 07:07, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Fredag 03 november 2006 15:16 skrev Andreas Jaeger:
> >> > 1) Is zmd slated for replacement before 10.2 final arrives?
> >>
> >> No, it will be in 10.2.
> >
> > But you can remove it
Gaël,
On Friday 03 November 2006 00:22, Gaël Lams wrote:
> "/etc/init.d/novell-zmd stop" should be enough to stop it (+ insserv
> -r novell-zmd)
% /etc/init.d/novell-zmd stop
Shutting down ZENworks Management Daemonfailed
The process is still there, but it is no longer consuming CPU cycl
Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fredag 03 november 2006 15:16 skrev Andreas Jaeger:
>> > 1) Is zmd slated for replacement before 10.2 final arrives?
>>
>> No, it will be in 10.2.
>
> But you can remove it manually. And you will not lose any functionality as
> zypper and opensuse-up
Fredag 03 november 2006 15:16 skrev Andreas Jaeger:
> > 1) Is zmd slated for replacement before 10.2 final arrives?
>
> No, it will be in 10.2.
But you can remove it manually. And you will not lose any functionality as
zypper and opensuse-updater can replace rug and zen-updater respectively. It
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 01:22:30PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> > Thanks for heading this issue in a constructive direction. Could you
> > add some pointers to the reversed engineer driver for NVIDIA GPUs? I
> > possibly add it to 10.2 as optional driver for testing
Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Cristian,
>
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 12:27, Cristian Rodriguez R. wrote:
>> Randall R Schulz wrote:
>> > Is it normal for this process to run on and on like this?
>>
>> Is expected but not normal...it is just another sign that zmd should
>> be "
To address a point made earlier:
Greg KH wrote:
> Both of these are third party packages, Ubuntu was forced to stop
> shipping their pre-built packages a while ago for the obvious legal
> reasons.
That's not true at all (see http://packages.ubuntu.com/edgy/x11/nvidia-glx ).
That is the package f
Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> Thanks for heading this issue in a constructive direction. Could you
> add some pointers to the reversed engineer driver for NVIDIA GPUs? I
> possibly add it to 10.2 as optional driver for testing purposes.
http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/ is the main address.
Excerpt f
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:32:03AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> James Ogley wrote:
> >> I agree, this is their problem, not ours. They know exactly what they
> >> must do to solve this issue, there is nothing that we can do.
> >
> > Greg, are you calling on nVidia to GPL their driver co
> That was the main reason I went to reiserfs from ext2, fsck.ext2 of a
> 20G drive was painful back then, 10x20G, I'd need to power up just
> before going to bed.
Precisely. Ext2 was and is pretty much useless on large filesystems
because one needs to take a day off work every 20 boots.
With r
James Ogley wrote:
>> I agree, this is their problem, not ours. They know exactly what they
>> must do to solve this issue, there is nothing that we can do.
>
> Greg, are you calling on nVidia to GPL their driver code? If so, have
> you contacted them directly and is there a formal way in which
Detlef Steuer wrote:
> so I´ll try again:
>
> Hi,
>
> what do others think of yesterday´s deal?
Bussiness as usual..
> How do you feel?
I feel this can be a good thing , but probably unlikely to affect us,
nor the buildservice , probably we will not notice any difference.
A (very unusual)
Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> That was the one I did not think of (I think up to now it was always
> 'disable' by default.
> Strangely, I am NOT able to change it using the GUI (by going to edit
> preferences connection, I just get an error.
That error is fixed for beta2 and with the packages a
Hi,
2) What is the proper way to deal with this? This instance of zmd has
now been running for 8 hours and has consumed over 120m of CPU time.
Should I kill it? Is there an init task I should disable to make it go
away permanently?
"/etc/init.d/novell-zmd stop" should be enough to stop it (+ i
31 matches
Mail list logo
