On 1/20/07, Hans Witvliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 21:14 +0100, Claes Bäckström wrote:
> Is there some problems with the sync to factory?
>
> Been a lot of commits to the commit mailinglist but nothing new at the
> mirrors since 15 Jan.
>
You mean "brand-new" or "new-upgra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I noticed several times now, (at least 3), that the systemtray icon
tells me that there are updates, in this case 7.
When i choose to install the updates, there is al kind of cpu activity,
but the list of available updates is not being fetched..
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 10:52 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Pascal Bleser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As Robert wrote, I think we should first define what kind of "minimal
> > package sets" we want/need.
>
> And I made a proposal for that one.
>
> > From the discussion up to this point, the
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 21:33 -0600, Rajko M. wrote:
> On Thursday 18 January 2007 02:39, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > I heard from several sides that the base system of openSUSE 10.2 is a
> > bit large - and agree and would like to discuss with you what we can
> > do.
> ...
>
> I would set target to a
I am happy with the base system we have now (10.2), and do *not* want
any major changes.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 20 January 2007 12:51, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> I am happy with the base system we have now (10.2), and do *not* want
> any major changes.
The present status is that we need small base that can be expanded.
How to achieve this is a topic of this thread, but obviously no one wants
maj
