s through the package manager is a Very Good Thing
(TM). Perhaps this can go onto a wishlist for the future... I'll try and put
down a good idea of what I think would work, why, etc, and post up a feature
request once I can.
Joseph M. Gaffney
aka CuCullin
rdware.
And I don't mean I won't use their hardware on a Linux machine. I mean I
_won't_ use their hardware.
Joseph M. Gaffney
aka CuCullin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 17:37, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2006 23:13 schrieb Joseph M. Gaffney:
> > You're saying a company ditching linux support means that people have
> > to scramble to appease the company? I demand the opposite. I use
>
is not included out of the
box yet?
[1] http://www.suseforums.net/index.php?showtop=209333
[2] http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/16340.html
[3] http://www.saillard.org/linux/pwc/files/
Joseph M. Gaffney
aka CuCullin
On Friday 17 February 2006 17:00, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 04:30:23PM -0500, Joseph M. Gaffney wrote:
> > [1] http://www.suseforums.net/index.php?showtop=209333
>
> Doesnt work, gets me to the front page.
>
> Ciao, Marcus
Whoops, typo
http
On Friday 17 February 2006 17:15, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Joseph M. Gaffney schrieb:
> > A recent thread [1] on suseforums at is ongoing and discussing the
> > webcam support in SUSE.
> >
> > I replied to the thread with a link to the Novell Cool Solutions feat
On Saturday 18 February 2006 15:35, Richard Bos wrote:
> Op zaterdag 18 februari 2006 04:44, schreef Joseph M. Gaffney:
> > Now, being the zealot and supporter that I am, I would love to be able to
> > recommend Linux as an alternative for desktop collaboration, but this is
>
how I could resolve it?
To give you an outline of whats on this machine, I had 10.0, and did a clean
install of 10.1 beta 3. I updated after beta 5 was released using factory,
and now I'm where I am at.
Thanks,
Joseph M. Gaffney
aka CuCullin
---
On Friday 03 March 2006 11:16, Joseph M. Gaffney wrote:
> I'm trying to update my installation, currently beta 5, using factory as I
> have been. I'm having some issues though.
>
> When using yast, the installation source will add properly, but when I try
> to fini
Ok, this isn't making much sense to me now. Maybe I'm misunderstanding
something here.
I thought *proprietary* drivers were being removed, and issued as kmp
packages. Now, open source, GPL'd software that gets linked to proprietary
software is removed as well?
Joseph M. Gaffney
a
>and y2pmsh cannot be uses for
> upgrading
>
Why not? I did, when I couldn't use other means.
Joseph M. Gaffney
aka CuCullin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;s consent.
We need to stop copying complete garbage from MS, and do original items that
are better. I'm getting sick of this "it worked for them, lets do the same!"
mentality. Linux isn't thriving because it copies functionality, it thrives
becau
I've
contacted [EMAIL PROTECTED] to post on suselinuxsupport.de as well.
I'm a bit put off by this for another reason; for such a significant change, I
would have thought the openSUSE community would have been asked for input on
the matter, which I did not see.
Joseph M. Gaffney
ak
On Friday 10 March 2006 14:18, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:45:30PM -0500, Joseph M. Gaffney wrote:
> > So nothing yet from Novell or the developers?
>
> Why should the developers say anything here about that? The whole
> discussion was completely emotional
On Monday 13 March 2006 05:39, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:45:30PM -0500, Joseph M. Gaffney wrote:
> > So nothing yet from Novell or the developers?
> >
> > I believe alot of people here have expressed serious concerns with the
> > use of a .Net
On Friday 10 March 2006 17:34, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> [keeping the thread, but changing the subject to a more descriptive one]
>
> Joseph M. Gaffney wrote:
> > On Friday 10 March 2006 14:18, Robert Schiele wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:45:30PM -0500, Joseph M.
does and understand. Realy interesting approach.
>
> houghi
+1. Pretty offensive, and imho, belittling the issue at hand.
It does go against standard naming practices. Though perhaps I should just go
edit my linux.ini and rc.bat?
Joseph M. Gaffney
aka CuCullin
---
On Monday 13 March 2006 13:53, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:23:11PM -0500, Joseph M. Gaffney wrote:
> > +1. Pretty offensive, and imho, belittling the issue at hand.
>
> Seems otherwise people don't get it.
>
> > It does go against standard nami
On Monday 13 March 2006 15:22, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:21:09PM -0500, Joseph M. Gaffney wrote:
> > It goes against standard posix naming practices. PE = portable across 32
> > and
>
> Could you point to the section of the POSIX standard that describ
On Monday 13 March 2006 16:00, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 03:34:22PM -0500, Joseph M. Gaffney wrote:
> > You're right, I spoke incorrectly. Bit busy at work and I blurted that
> > out mistakenly.
> >
> > Instead, I'll revise my comment t
On Monday 13 March 2006 17:10, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:11:53PM -0500, Joseph M. Gaffney wrote:
> > And PE is used on 32 and 64 bit Windows. So what you're saying is, we're
>
> And on any implementation of the CLI specification like Mono.
Corre
ended up stopping the update
because of the usage I was seeing.. it was locking up my laptop.
Joseph M. Gaffney
aka CuCullin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and almost selected the wrong
option). Perhaps the old way, "Finish" would be a better option instead of
"No"? Maybe "Add More Packages" and "Finished Installing" would be good
options.
Whichever really; I just don't think "Yes
. Most users
who don't care will simply click "ok" with the given pre-determined size, and
anyone with any particular interest greater than "who the hell cares" will
not only be informed of whats suggested, but offer them the chance to make it
more "right" -
On Thursday 16 March 2006 14:37, houghi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:15:51PM -0500, Joseph M. Gaffney wrote:
> > Why does it have to be automated, really?
>
> Ease of use
>
> > A simple question to the user could briefly explain intent, why a
> > differ
25 matches
Mail list logo
