Hi,
Can someone from SUSE tell me how bug handling is done there? I mean,
if there is a bug reported for some version and is not fixed in that
version, is it taken in account for upcoming versions or it is just
forgotten? An example:
- a bug (like #176249 and previously #148638) is reported fo
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:57:55PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone from SUSE tell me how bug handling is done there? I mean,
> if there is a bug reported for some version and is not fixed in that
> version, is it taken in account for upcoming versions or it is just
> forgotte
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 17:04, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:57:55PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can someone from SUSE tell me how bug handling is done there? I
> > mean, if there is a bug reported for some version and is not fixed
> > in that version, is it
On 24 May 2006 at 16:04, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:57:55PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can someone from SUSE tell me how bug handling is done there? I mean,
> > if there is a bug reported for some version and is not fixed in that
> > version, is it tak
Hi,
may I attach a similar (and most probably already asked...) question here?
Is there a general rule what to do with publicly accessible reports that are
duplicates of already known, not publicly accessible ones. In most cases the
not publicly accessible original will remain private.
I'm not
lør, 27,.05.2006 kl. 09.33 +0200, skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
>
> Precisely, in this case it's about the problem of not being able to mount
> floppies from within GNOME. The error message is "Method "Mount" with
> signature "ssas" on interface "org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Volume" doesn't
> ex
Hi,
and yet another Bug-handling related question:
What happens if a report gets lost in NEEDINFO status even though the
requested information was indeed provided. I.e., a bug is NEEDINFO'd to
the reporter, the reporter provides the information but forgets to reset
the NEEDINFO status.
If a pers
Andreas Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> and yet another Bug-handling related question:
>
> What happens if a report gets lost in NEEDINFO status even though the
> requested information was indeed provided. I.e., a bug is NEEDINFO'd to
> the reporter, the reporter provides the informati
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:24:23AM +0200, Andreas Hanke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> and yet another Bug-handling related question:
I have also one. How long after nothing has happend to a bug should you
start taking action again and what is the correct procedure to 'ping' it?
--
houghi http://houg
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 11:55 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
> Andreas Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What happens if a report gets lost in NEEDINFO status even though
> > the requested information was indeed provided. [...]
> > If a person without any relation to the bug notices that, is
10 matches
Mail list logo
