"Dominique Leuenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do they also change the behaviour of replying messages? I mean, it
> would be nice to have the quoted text. GW (ok, I admit, I still have
> 6.5 SP5) is a bit a pain, as TopPosting is not welcome
> (understandable), but GW does not even indent t
>>> Susanne Oberhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/14/06 5:04 PM >>>
>"Dominique Leuenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I for my part am using GroupWise (is also from Novell, just in case
> somebody wonders) and there this option just does not exist.
>
>It's in the works: https://bugzilla.novell
"Dominique Leuenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I for my part am using GroupWise (is also from Novell, just in case
> somebody wonders) and there this option just does not exist.
It's in the works: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=145856
would some thunderbird user to report t
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 04:28:16PM +0200, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday, August 13, 2006 at 15:43:06, houghi wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 03:18:50PM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> >
> > > indeed, that is true. BUT: unfortunately not all mail clients respect
> > > these
>
Hi,
On Sunday, August 13, 2006 at 15:43:06, houghi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 03:18:50PM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
>
> > indeed, that is true. BUT: unfortunately not all mail clients respect these
> > headers. Or to be more precise: most don't
> > That's why houghi (and also I) wer
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 03:18:50PM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> indeed, that is true. BUT: unfortunately not all mail clients respect these
> headers. Or to be more precise: most don't
> That's why houghi (and also I) were pointing to that fact on the list.
>
> And apparently, there are
* jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-13-06 03:37]:
> lookup in what? does this mean you store locally all the
> mails of the list?
no, only their addresses
08:42 wahoo:~ > rpm -qi lbdb
Name: lbdb Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 0.30
Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
* jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-12-06 16:52]:
this is _not_ nice. it makes it impossible to join the
author of the mail
depends
I use mutt and lbdb. If a person has sent mail to a list where I'm
subscribed and I have received it, I can lookup that person's name a
Pascal Bleser a écrit :
Email addresses on public mailing-list archives are the biggest help for
spammers. There is no way those emails should _not_ be obfuscated.
I subscribe many lists with no obfuscation and survive :-).
I appreciate returns from archives readers.
and this could be human
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdd wrote:
> Henne Vogelsang a écrit :
>>> * Its possible on this list to ask to have the adress masked (in the
>>> archives only)
>>
>> ... all email addresses are already obfuscated in our archive by
>> stripping the domain part (replacing it by
* jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-12-06 16:52]:
> this is _not_ nice. it makes it impossible to join the
> author of the mail
depends
I use mutt and lbdb. If a person has sent mail to a list where I'm
subscribed and I have received it, I can lookup that person's name and
get his email addr.
16
Henne Vogelsang a écrit :
* use of an "X-No-Archive: yes" header that makes your mail
not to be archived at all
You can do that. Our archiving system honors this header but..
this is nice
* Its possible on this list to ask to have the adress masked
(in the archives only)
... all email
Hi,
On Saturday, August 12, 2006 at 18:26:18, jdd wrote:
> Rajko M a écrit :
>
> >With present configuration where private addresses are sent out with
> >mails to all subscribers
>
> this is mandatory in the RFC for mails. if not the mail
> would be anonymous, not a good practice
>
> the archi
Rajko M a écrit :
Complains here are about Reply To field, but the list server
configuration is actually the problem.
Rjko, you are actually highjacking a thread :-) There is a
very long thread on an other list on this very subject :-)
but let's try to find an answer :-)
With present con
Henne Vogelsang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, August 12, 2006 at 06:24:21, Rajko M wrote:
>> Henne Vogelsang wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 11, 2006 at 18:37:12, houghi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:15:49PM +0200, jdd wrote:
It is regretable that the list does not wor as before. I
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 01:00:17PM +0200, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, August 11, 2006 at 18:37:12, houghi wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:15:49PM +0200, jdd wrote:
> >
> > It is regretable that the list does not wor as before. I have not seen any
> > complaints that the repl
Hi,
On Saturday, August 12, 2006 at 06:24:21, Rajko M wrote:
> Henne Vogelsang wrote:
> > On Friday, August 11, 2006 at 18:37:12, houghi wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:15:49PM +0200, jdd wrote:
> >>
> >> It is regretable that the list does not wor as before. I have not seen any
> >> compla
Henne Vogelsang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, August 11, 2006 at 18:37:12, houghi wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:15:49PM +0200, jdd wrote:
>>
>> It is regretable that the list does not wor as before. I have not seen any
>> complaints that the reply was send default to the list.
>
> As ml-admi
Hi,
On Friday, August 11, 2006 at 18:37:12, houghi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:15:49PM +0200, jdd wrote:
>
> It is regretable that the list does not wor as before. I have not seen any
> complaints that the reply was send default to the list.
As ml-admin i have seen plenty requests to cha
Hi,
* this setup is the one of suse-linux-e for years now, and
that of most linux related lists
And that means it should forever be that way? I think it is a very bad
way to do it. The fact that everybody else is doing something does not
mean it is the right way.
I hate this setup also VERY mu
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:15:49PM +0200, jdd wrote:
> * this setup is the one of suse-linux-e for years now, and
> that of most linux related lists
And that means it should forever be that way? I think it is a very bad way
to do it. The fact that everybody else is doing something does not mean i
On 06/08/11 10:39 (GMT-0400) Patrick Shanahan apparently typed:
> * Kevin Ivory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-11-06 09:55]:
>> thunderbird doesn't
> hummm, broken client. Adjust or change!
> OR, advise thunderbird developers *they* need to change.
They recent provided the back end that allows an ex
Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
* Kevin Ivory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-11-06 09:55]:
thunderbird doesn't
hummm, broken client. Adjust or change!
OR, advise thunderbird developers *they* need to change.
may I say that:
* this setup is the one of suse-linux-e for years now, and
that of most lin
On 06/08/11 15:52 (GMT+0200) Henne Vogelsang apparently typed:
> Which mailer does not support it?
> kmail does
> evolution does
> mutt does
> pine does
The more popular cross-platform ones mostly don't:
Mozilla
SeaMonkey
Thunderbird (extension available to alter this)
AFAIK, the most common o
* Kevin Ivory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-11-06 09:55]:
>
> thunderbird doesn't
>
hummm, broken client. Adjust or change!
OR, advise thunderbird developers *they* need to change.
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
http://wahoo.no-ip.org
On 2006-08-11 at 16:17:22 +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote (shortened):
>
> >>> Stefan Bogner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11-08-2006 16:57 >>>
> >Am Freitag, 11. August 2006 15:54 schrieb Kevin Ivory:
> > thunderbird doesn't
> >
> >http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/
> >
> >Stefan
>
> Thanks for this adv
>>> Kevin Ivory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11-08-2006 17:03 >>>
On 2006-08-11 15:57, Stefan Bogner wrote:> Am Freitag, 11. August 2006 15:54 schrieb Kevin Ivory:>> thunderbird doesn't> > http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/>>been there, done that.>I have mail redirect 0.7.4 installed. That tool is for bouncin
>>> Stefan Bogner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11-08-2006 16:57 >>>
>Am Freitag, 11. August 2006 15:54 schrieb Kevin Ivory:> thunderbird doesn't>>http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/>>Stefan
Thanks for this advise!
In this case, openSUSE should have this extension compiled in the packages. So all openSUSE use
>>> Henne Vogelsang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11-08-2006 16:52 >>>
>Hi,>>On Friday, August 11, 2006 at 15:18:50, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:> >>> William Gallafent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11-08-2006 16:10 >On Friday 11 August 2006 13:53, houghi wrote:> >> > Just noticed that the "Reply-to" is now poin
On 2006-08-11 15:57, Stefan Bogner wrote:
> Am Freitag, 11. August 2006 15:54 schrieb Kevin Ivory:
>> thunderbird doesn't
>
> http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/
been there, done that.
I have mail redirect 0.7.4 installed. That tool is for bouncing
mails, not for "reply to list". I use it regularly.
Am Freitag, 11. August 2006 15:54 schrieb Kevin Ivory:
> thunderbird doesn't
http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/
Stefan
On 2006-08-11 15:52, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
> Which mailer does not support it?
>
> kmail does
> evolution does
> mutt does
> pine does
thunderbird doesn't
Kevin
--
_ | Kevin Ivory | Tel: +49-551-370
|_ |\ || Service Network GmbH | Fax: +49-551-37
Hi,
On Friday, August 11, 2006 at 15:18:50, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> >>> William Gallafent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11-08-2006 16:10 >>>
> >On Friday 11 August 2006 13:53, houghi wrote:
> >
> > Just noticed that the "Reply-to" is now pointed to the
> > sender. Could this be adjusted so it is send
>>> William Gallafent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11-08-2006 16:10 >>>
>On Friday 11 August 2006 13:53, houghi wrote:>> Just noticed that the "Reply-to" is now pointed to the> sender. Could this be adjusted so it is send to the list> as it was before?>>As far as I can see, there is no "Reply-To" header, i
34 matches
Mail list logo
