On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 08:40:29AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> On 18 May 2006 at 19:35, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:31:55PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > > On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:31, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > > > Also, if you now install a package it will check
On 18 May 2006 at 19:35, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:31:55PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:31, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > > Also, if you now install a package it will check if there is a
> > > security update and retrieve and install the fixed p
On 18 May 2006 at 19:31, Marcus Meissner wrote:
[...]
> Also, if you now install a package it will check if there is a security update
> and retrieve and install the fixed package instead.
Also this is how things work in HP-UX: They add patches to the media which
contains the products. Installat
> Without an internet connection, the package manager wouldn't know about
> available updates, right?
Without a *network* connection (unless you have specially prepared
media). The whole of the "internet" could be that box dishing out a copy
of the updates from the other end of that 1m cable, alt
On Thursday 18 May 2006 21:31, Hartmut Meyer wrote:
> Without an internet connection, the package manager wouldn't know
> about available updates, right?
Imagine the following situation: you used the online update, but did not
install e.g the Opera patch. The package manager knows about the Opera
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2006 19:35 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:30:51PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:31, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > > Also, if you now install a package it will check if there is a
> > > security update and retrieve and inst
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:29:43PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> 1) You anyway need to release a new version for each SUSE release, so
> you could get the ISO name and hardcode into the script. ;-)
I will then miss some ISO names (SLES and so on) and it will become HUGE.
> 2) create a config fi
On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:35, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:31:55PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:31, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > > Also, if you now install a package it will check if there is a
> > > security update and retrieve and install the fi
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:34:24PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >
> > Also, if you now install a package it will check if there is a security
> > update
> > and retrieve and install the fixed package instead.
>
> Now that is definitely great! Is this also possi
Hi,
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Marcus Meissner wrote:
Also, if you now install a package it will check if there is a security
update and retrieve and install the fixed package instead.
Now that is definitely great! Is this also possible during installation?
Let me
Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
> Also, if you now install a package it will check if there is a security update
> and retrieve and install the fixed package instead.
Now that is definitely great! Is this also possible during installation?
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
--
http://www.hailfinger.org/
-
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:30:51PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:31, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > Also, if you now install a package it will check if there is a
> > security update and retrieve and install the fixed package instead.
>
> Is this silently done?
Yes.
> What
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:31:55PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:31, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > Also, if you now install a package it will check if there is a
> > security update and retrieve and install the fixed package instead.
>
> I was too quick as I have a 3rd ques
On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:31, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Also, if you now install a package it will check if there is a
> security update and retrieve and install the fixed package instead.
I was too quick as I have a 3rd question as well: does it retrieve the
full package from the update mirror o
On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:31, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Also, if you now install a package it will check if there is a
> security update and retrieve and install the fixed package instead.
Is this silently done? What happens if you don't have an internet
connection at install time?
Andras
--
Q
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 18:06, houghi wrote:
> Also it might be that there is no CD[1-5] because they use a DVD, or
> nameing changes with a next version, or people use real CDs.
> I also do not have the names of all ISOs available from SUSE.
1) You anyway need to release a new version for each S
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:26:58PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 18 May 2006, houghi wrote:
> >On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 06:56:08PM +0200, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote:
> >>On Wednesday 17 May 2006 18:44, jdd wrote:
> >>>Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
>
> But you can click 'em
Hi,
On Thu, 18 May 2006, houghi wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 06:56:08PM +0200, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote:
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 18:44, jdd wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
But you can click 'em to force installation.
what can a patch do if the main file is not installed?
jdd (cur
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 06:56:08PM +0200, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 May 2006 18:44, jdd wrote:
> > Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> > > But you can click 'em to force installation.
> >
> > what can a patch do if the main file is not installed?
> > jdd (curious :-)
>
> install the
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 18:44, jdd wrote:
> Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> > But you can click 'em to force installation.
>
> what can a patch do if the main file is not installed?
> jdd (curious :-)
install the packages
Duncan
-
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
So just believe me. ;-))
I always do :-)
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos
Hi,
On Wed, 17 May 2006, jdd wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
But you can click 'em to force installation.
what can a patch do if the main file is not installed?
YOU has "full" RPMs also.
jdd (curious :-)
So just believe me. ;-))
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED],
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
But you can click 'em to force installation.
what can a patch do if the main file is not installed?
jdd (curious :-)
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_p
Hi,
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote:
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 10:48, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Christoph Thiel wrote:
It even shows the patches if opera and pdns are *not* installed.
but then they are not selected for installation
But you can click 'em to force inst
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 10:48, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Christoph Thiel wrote:
> It even shows the patches if opera and pdns are *not* installed.
but then they are not selected for installation
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:31:00PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 20:06, houghi wrote:
> > I am trying to figure out a foolproof way to get this done right.
> > Doing the copying in 'normal' order instead of reverse is not a
> > foolproof way.
>
> First copy the ISOs that are
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 20:06, houghi wrote:
> I am trying to figure out a foolproof way to get this done right.
> Doing the copying in 'normal' order instead of reverse is not a
> foolproof way.
First copy the ISOs that are not labeled CD1...5 and later the CD1...5
in reverse order. I'm sure it c
Christoph Thiel wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
>>> I'm officially confused by the new way of updating. First: are there
>>> any updates available at this moment? If I start the "Online update"
>>> from Yast, it says no patches available.
>> There should be an opera and a
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:10:09PM +0200, jdd wrote:
> houghi wrote:
>
> >And now you have lost me completely, even the word makes sense now.
>
> when you setup an install source for yast, you can use yast
> to copy the cd content to the same directory, but you also
> can just copy the content
Hi,
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Andras Mantia wrote:
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 23:08, Anders Johansson wrote:
Well, I said it was a first try. I'm not sure yet how the new libzypp
stuff works.
but hm, have you tried restarting zmd (rczmd restart)? Just in case
it's cached, I mean (does "rug products"
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 23:08, Anders Johansson wrote:
> Well, I said it was a first try. I'm not sure yet how the new libzypp
> stuff works.
>
> but hm, have you tried restarting zmd (rczmd restart)? Just in case
> it's cached, I mean (does "rug products" show add-on as installed?)
>
> I can't find
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:59, Andras Mantia wrote:
> I can remove it (I have only one referring to add-on), but I assume it
> needs to be replaced with a file from a "clean" 10.1 install. I tested,
> it's not enough to remove it.
Well, I said it was a first try. I'm not sure yet how the new libzyp
houghi wrote:
And now you have lost me completely, even the word makes sense now.
when you setup an install source for yast, you can use yast
to copy the cd content to the same directory, but you also
can just copy the content of any and all the cd on the same
directory under subdirectories
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:51:10PM +0200, jdd wrote:
> houghi wrote:
> >On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:18:12PM +0200, jdd wrote:
> >
> >>houghi wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I am trying to figure out a foolproof way to get this done right. Doing
> >>>the copying in 'normal' order instead of reverse is not a fo
Andras Mantia wrote:
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 17:08, Marcus Meissner wrote:
Check the configured Update Server by hand please, if it has the
pathces already. Perhaps it is behind in time :/
I would if I would know where to check it. ;-) As I wrote in the
original mail, the config dialogs in Y
houghi wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:18:12PM +0200, jdd wrote:
houghi wrote:
I am trying to figure out a foolproof way to get this done right. Doing
the copying in 'normal' order instead of reverse is not a foolproof way.
I didn't test it with dvd, but when using a gard drive as
sourc
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:18:12PM +0200, jdd wrote:
> houghi wrote:
>
> >I am trying to figure out a foolproof way to get this done right. Doing
> >the copying in 'normal' order instead of reverse is not a foolproof way.
>
> I didn't test it with dvd, but when using a gard drive as
> source, ya
Andras Mantia wrote:
- adding it took lot of time
any open of change source or install software takes hours...
this is the main problem with net install, there as quite
frequent packages updates, so the refresh is necessary (if
you don't, the dowloading of packages fails).
I know no solut
houghi wrote:
I am trying to figure out a foolproof way to get this done right. Doing
the copying in 'normal' order instead of reverse is not a foolproof way.
I didn't test it with dvd, but when using a gard drive as
source, yast is able to see the cd's as "disk1, disk2..."
may be this coul
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 20:51, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:34, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 May 2006 20:29, Anders Johansson wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:22, Cord Walter wrote:
> > > > > If you had the Add On CD in the DVD, then this will happen.
> > > >
>
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:34, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 20:29, Anders Johansson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:22, Cord Walter wrote:
> > > > If you had the Add On CD in the DVD, then this will happen.
> > >
> > > That's the case with my installation. Is there a workaround
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 20:29, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:22, Cord Walter wrote:
> > > If you had the Add On CD in the DVD, then this will happen.
> >
> > That's the case with my installation. Is there a workaround?
>
> As I didn't use the addon when installing I can't reall
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:22, Cord Walter wrote:
> > If you had the Add On CD in the DVD, then this will happen.
>
> That's the case with my installation. Is there a workaround?
As I didn't use the addon when installing I can't really test this, but have
you tried going to /var/lib/zypp/db/produc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:31:47PM +0100, Karsten Ehrig wrote:
>> Kenneth Schneider wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 15:36 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>>>
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:50:21PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
>>
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:28:43PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 17:42, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > > I've updated RC3-->GM via a DVD created with makeSuSEdvd (v. 0.30)
> > > and the "Online Update Configuration" failed with the message "No
> > > products to register.".
> >
>
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:32, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 17:13, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > YaST2 -> Change Installation Source. It should list at least 1
> > remote Update Mirror ;)
>
> Hm, I have only the local cd:/// entry... Should this remote
> repository added by the install
Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 17:42, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
>>> I've updated RC3-->GM via a DVD created with makeSuSEdvd (v. 0.30)
>>> and the "Online Update Configuration" failed with the message "No
>>> products to register.".
>>>
>> If you had the Add On CD in the DVD
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 17:13, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> YaST2 -> Change Installation Source. It should list at least 1 remote
> Update Mirror ;)
Hm, I have only the local cd:/// entry... Should this remote repository
added by the installer automatically or I should put it in manually?
Andras
--
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 17:42, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > I've updated RC3-->GM via a DVD created with makeSuSEdvd (v. 0.30)
> > and the "Online Update Configuration" failed with the message "No
> > products to register.".
>
> If you had the Add On CD in the DVD, then this will happen.
Hm, I also p
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:31:47PM +0100, Karsten Ehrig wrote:
> Kenneth Schneider wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 15:36 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:50:21PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'm officially confused by the new way
Kenneth Schneider wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 15:36 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:50:21PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm officially confused by the new way of updating. First: are there
>>> any updates available at this moment? If I s
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 15:36 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:50:21PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm officially confused by the new way of updating. First: are there
> > any updates available at this moment? If I start the "Online update"
> > from Yast,
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:07:57PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 17:08, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > Check the configured Update Server by hand please, if it has the
> > pathces already. Perhaps it is behind in time :/
>
> I would if I would know where to check it. ;-) As I wr
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 17:08, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Check the configured Update Server by hand please, if it has the
> pathces already. Perhaps it is behind in time :/
I would if I would know where to check it. ;-) As I wrote in the
original mail, the config dialogs in Yast are not really work
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:04:26PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 16:40, Christoph Thiel wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 May 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > > > I'm officially confused by the new way of updating. First: are
> > > > there any updates available at this moment? If I star
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 16:40, Christoph Thiel wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > > I'm officially confused by the new way of updating. First: are
> > > there any updates available at this moment? If I start the
> > > "Online update" from Yast, it says no patches available.
>
Kenneth Schneider wrote:
Which leads to why it is -not- called "Automatic Online Update Setup"
and avoid the confusion. Perhaps it is a language translation thing.
on french, "online update configuration" is not translated
at all.
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > I'm officially confused by the new way of updating. First: are there
> > any updates available at this moment? If I start the "Online update"
> > from Yast, it says no patches available.
>
> There should be an opera and a pdns security patch.
..
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:50:21PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm officially confused by the new way of updating. First: are there
> any updates available at this moment? If I start the "Online update"
> from Yast, it says no patches available.
There should be an opera and a pdns s
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 15:50 +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm officially confused by the new way of updating. First: are there
> any updates available at this moment? If I start the "Online update"
> from Yast, it says no patches available.
> I tried to see how can I configure the onli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andras Mantia wrote:
>
> Does online update work for anyone or this is just a plain bug and I
> should report.
Same here...
>
> I used 10.1-GM, from a DVD created with makeSUSEdvd 0.29 (and yes, I get
> a signing error). I updated an RC2 system
Hi,
I'm officially confused by the new way of updating. First: are there
any updates available at this moment? If I start the "Online update"
from Yast, it says no patches available.
I tried to see how can I configure the online update. To my surprise
there are two entries called "Online Upda
62 matches
Mail list logo
