-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Hanke schreef:
Dominique Leuenberger schrieb:
I have a Mozilla Firefox 64bit edition installed on my Box and the
flash plugin works great in there (flash is known to exist only as
32bit).
I have the nspluginwrapper installed (from
* Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jan 09. 2007 08:29]:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:57:20AM +0100, Andreas Hanke wrote:
Robert Schiele schrieb:
Huh? And how do you expect people that have the 64bit Firefox from the
installation get their security update then?
That doesn't really
Robert Schiele schrieb:
Huh? And how do you expect people that have the 64bit Firefox from the
installation get their security update then?
That doesn't really matter after having it offered for more than 2
weeks, by now most x86_64 users have been upgraded to
MozillaFirefox.x86_64 anyways, so
On 09-01-2007 at 03:57, Andreas Hanke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Robert Schiele schrieb:
Huh? And how do you expect people that have the 64bit Firefox from
the
installation get their security update then?
That doesn't really matter after having it offered for more than 2
weeks, by now most
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:57:20AM +0100, Andreas Hanke wrote:
Robert Schiele schrieb:
Huh? And how do you expect people that have the 64bit Firefox from the
installation get their security update then?
That doesn't really matter after having it offered for more than 2
weeks, by now most
Dominique Leuenberger schrieb:
I have a Mozilla Firefox 64bit edition installed on my Box and the
flash plugin works great in there (flash is known to exist only as
32bit).
I have the nspluginwrapper installed (from repos.opensuse.org/mozilla)
and this works just great.
nspluginwrapper is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all, best wishes...
After reorganising my hdd, according to the new expectations, i
Installed 10.2 from the retail dvd, i got for testing, subject still the
same as before...
I attached the logs to Bug #230687.
Since there was improvement, i
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 11:46:50AM +0100, M9. wrote:
Hi all, best wishes...
After reorganising my hdd, according to the new expectations, i
Installed 10.2 from the retail dvd, i got for testing, subject still the
same as before...
I attached the logs to Bug #230687.
Since there was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcus Meissner schreef:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 11:46:50AM +0100, M9. wrote:
Hi all, best wishes...
After reorganising my hdd, according to the new expectations, i
Installed 10.2 from the retail dvd, i got for testing, subject still the
same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M9. schreef:
Marcus Meissner schreef:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 11:46:50AM +0100, M9. wrote:
Hi all, best wishes...
After reorganising my hdd, according to the new expectations, i
Installed 10.2 from the retail dvd, i got for testing,
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 01:00:52PM +0100, M9. wrote:
M9. schreef:
Marcus Meissner schreef:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 11:46:50AM +0100, M9. wrote:
Hi all, best wishes...
After reorganising my hdd, according to the new expectations, i
Installed 10.2 from the retail dvd, i got
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcus Meissner schreef:
I tried again, the only problem was libgpod: no installable providers of
python 2.5 for libgpod-0.4.0-14.pm.0.x86_64[20070105-155207]
Now it nicely asked for to install new packages, to fullfill the
dependencies, and
Hi,
In your case I suspect you installed a 64bit MozillaFirefox-translations
and the 32bit MozillaFirefox and it blows up a bit.
No. Mixing MozillaFirefox and MozillaFirefox-translations of different
architectures is perfectly valid from the dependency point of view and cannot
be the reason
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 07:36:13AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MozillaFirefox.x86_64 has to disappear from the update repository.
Unfortunately it's there since 2 weeks already, making it a bit difficult to
resolve now because users might have already installed it via other tools or
14 matches
Mail list logo
