Martin Schlander wrote:
> Fredag 05 januar 2007 15:45 skrev Jan Kupec:
>> Last thing to add is that zypper is still in an early development stage
>> and will improve.
>
> Does rug have an equivalent to the "zypper sh" functionality? Maybe it's
> irrelevant because of the daemon, not sure, haven't
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 01:22:38AM +0100, Martin Schlander wrote:
> Fredag 05 januar 2007 17:44 skrev Martin Schlander:
> > Fredag 05 januar 2007 15:45 skrev Jan Kupec:
> > > Last thing to add is that zypper is still in an early development stage
> > > and will improve.
> >
> > Does rug have an equ
Fredag 05 januar 2007 17:44 skrev Martin Schlander:
> Fredag 05 januar 2007 15:45 skrev Jan Kupec:
> > Last thing to add is that zypper is still in an early development stage
> > and will improve.
>
> Does rug have an equivalent to the "zypper sh" functionality? Maybe it's
> irrelevant because of t
Fredag 05 januar 2007 15:45 skrev Jan Kupec:
> Last thing to add is that zypper is still in an early development stage
> and will improve.
Does rug have an equivalent to the "zypper sh" functionality? Maybe it's
irrelevant because of the daemon, not sure, haven't used rug/zmd much.
I also belie
Hi,
Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting with this to the factory list as I don't want to bother
> > 'regular user support' in the opensuse-ML.
> >
> > Everybody nowadays is talking about how much better zypper would be
> > compared to rug/zmd.
> > Can somebody just in short te
Hi,
I'm getting with this to the factory list as I don't want to bother
'regular user support' in the opensuse-ML.
Everybody nowadays is talking about how much better zypper would be
compared to rug/zmd.
Can somebody just in short tell me where the advantage is? Ok: it does
not use the zm-daemon,
