On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le vendredi 11 mars 2011, à 14:48 +, Nelson Marques a écrit :
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
>> > Le lundi 07 mars 2011, à 19:37 +0100, Kim Leyendecker a écrit :
>> >> What´s the technology way we want do for the
Am Freitag, 11. März 2011, 15:58:21 schrieb Vincent Untz:
> Le vendredi 11 mars 2011, à 14:48 +, Nelson Marques a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > Le lundi 07 mars 2011, à 19:37 +0100, Kim Leyendecker a écrit :
> > >> What´s the technology way we want do f
Le vendredi 11 mars 2011, à 14:48 +, Nelson Marques a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le lundi 07 mars 2011, à 19:37 +0100, Kim Leyendecker a écrit :
> >> What´s the technology way we want do for the 11.4 successor?
> > [...]
> >> * KDE 4.x and GNOME 2.x _and
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le lundi 07 mars 2011, à 19:37 +0100, Kim Leyendecker a écrit :
>> What´s the technology way we want do for the 11.4 successor?
> [...]
>> * KDE 4.x and GNOME 2.x _and_ GNOME 3.x
>
> I don't think the GNOME team has planned to have both GNOME
Le lundi 07 mars 2011, à 19:37 +0100, Kim Leyendecker a écrit :
> What´s the technology way we want do for the 11.4 successor?
[...]
> * KDE 4.x and GNOME 2.x _and_ GNOME 3.x
I don't think the GNOME team has planned to have both GNOME versions. If
that's something people want to see happen, please
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Kim Leyendecker
wrote:
> 03/07/2011 jdd wrote:
>
> Now that 11.4 is done and nearly out, we can think of the future.
>
>
> Okay, let us think of the future. After the whole discussion about the
> 11.4 vs 12.0 topic in the end of the development cycle for the don
