I believe that this change has been made in this way to lets focus on
the activities and not on the role
I think (but not sure) that the purpose of these changes (names and
approval) is to provide an idea of the kind;
No matter the title, if there is commitment, everyone can collaborate
on
On 21 May 2013 10:11, Koushik Kumar Nundy kknu...@gmail.com wrote:
TL;DR : Why change the name at all? Why remove vetting of list? If
name is to be changed, Geeko sounds awesome, albeit irrelevant, and
would get my vote.
Why remove vetting? the original Ambassador programme had a confusing
Hello mates,
Well we have advocate and evangelist that might cause us some problems.
I would like also to add ambassador that sounds more politics role than
actual promote openSUSE role (by the way promoter is cool word because
it's just a word).
Do we want a title to do the job?
Personally I
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Koushik Kumar Nundy kknu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2013 15:54, Kostas Koudaras warlord...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are seriously thinking of a rename:
What about openSUSE Jedi?
The problem with a pop-culture reference, is that it creates an inside
joke,
Hello,
On 05/11/2013 01:55 PM, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
For example, the boothbox contents are being developed here:
https://board.opensuse.org/projects/travel-support-program-management/wiki/Booth_box
Input welcome, of course.
OK. Just read it (well, most of it :-) ). So, I have a couple of
On Saturday 11 May 2013 14:20:01 Peter Czanik wrote:
Hello,
On 05/11/2013 01:55 PM, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
For example, the boothbox contents are being developed here:
https://board.opensuse.org/projects/travel-support-program-management/wi
ki/Booth_box Input welcome, of course.
OK.
