On Di 19 Jun 2007 13:47:51 CEST Klaus Singvogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Therefore we are doing a switch in openSUSE 10.3 RSN:
- gpg will be dropped
ok.
- gpg2 will be renamed to gpg
not ok.
We didn't noticed any problems regarding backward compatibility,
but we weren't able to do verey
Lars Rupp wrote:
- gpg2 will be renamed to gpg
not ok.
I'm not maintainer for gpg2. Please send any such suggestions
directly to him. :-)
We didn't noticed any problems regarding backward compatibility,
but we weren't able to do verey single test case. :-)
man gpg2
No manual entry
Hello,
we're (Lukáš Tinkl and myself) want to stop supporting gpg (aka.
GnuPG). Reason is, that developing of gpg has stopped (only in bugfix
mode), and use gpg2 instead, as it seems to be getting a stable
version now.
Therefore we are doing a switch in openSUSE 10.3 RSN:
- gpg will be dropped
-
On 2007-06-19 13:47:51 +0200, Klaus Singvogel wrote:
Therefore we are doing a switch in openSUSE 10.3 RSN:
- gpg will be dropped
- gpg2 will be renamed to gpg
why renaming it?
to fullfil old Requires a simple:
Provides: gpg = %{version}-%{release}
would be enough. and everybody would know
