Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-17 Thread Rajko M
Anniyka Wandersmann wrote: On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Rajko M wrote: Jonathan Arson wrote: On 7/16/06, Peter Flodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course I suspect that we will never see this user again, and it was created just to create links to his sites, to improve link ranking in Google. But

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-17 Thread houghi
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 01:45:32PM +0200, jdd wrote: Rajko M wrote: In this case problem was that it was personal page, for any other I will remove links without thinking a second. The way it is done tells that this guy has experience with posting such rubbish to wikies. He posted where it

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-17 Thread jdd
houghi wrote: So we come back to what I posted earlier. If you feel there is abuse on a personal page, you inform the webmaster and he should decide what should happen. the webmaster have probably better to do than this, ask him only in last ressort I could put the source of libdvdcss on

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-17 Thread houghi
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 02:50:48PM +0200, jdd wrote: houghi wrote: So we come back to what I posted earlier. If you feel there is abuse on a personal page, you inform the webmaster and he should decide what should happen. the webmaster have probably better to do than this, ask him only

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread Rajko M
jdd wrote: Rajko M wrote: Is this regular user with strange taste, or something else. Check where links will lead: http://en.opensuse.org/User:Joer80 More editors are coming, and more guys with similar taste for links will come. It seems that guides have to be expanded.

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread Orn E. Hansen
söndaginn 16 juli 2006 13:27 skrev Rajko M: Is this regular user with strange taste, or something else. Check where links will lead: http://en.opensuse.org/User:Joer80 More editors are coming, and more guys with similar taste for links will come. It seems that guides have to be expanded.

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread Orn E. Hansen
söndaginn 16 juli 2006 13:39 skrev jdd: may be we must clear a rule for the user page content, knowing that this page have the same viewing as normal page Why? I don't keep anything on my own page, and I am amazed at people who can't keep their nose where it belongs ... on their own face.

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread Orn E. Hansen
söndaginn 16 juli 2006 13:55 skrev Rajko M: Article Directory Free Auction Templates Liability Car Insurance Retirement Income Planning The attitude of wanting to ban people because what they link up, is offensive, in my opinion. I am not going to open his links, as I'm not interested in

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread houghi
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 05:04:20PM +0200, Orn E. Hansen wrote: SPAM means Send Phenominal Amount of Mail ... and exclusively means such activity. Someone putting links on his or her is not equivalent to SPAM. I agree with your point of view, however SPAM does not mean what you say it means.

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread jdd
Rajko M wrote: I meant to check links on the page listed under personal links. I understood that. but I can see a difference with a regular user writing advertisement for his own industry on the wiki (bad, but anybody could remove the link with some gentle words of explanation) and people

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread Jonathan Arson
This absolutely IS SPAM ... anything linking to a link farm is in my book spam ... Now tell me how this user should be allowed to link LINK FARM on opensuse.org on the pretext of doing it in his home dir...

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread Rajko M
houghi wrote: On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 05:04:20PM +0200, Orn E. Hansen wrote: SPAM means Send Phenominal Amount of Mail ... and exclusively means such activity. Someone putting links on his or her is not equivalent to SPAM. I agree with your point of view, however SPAM does not mean what

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread Rajko M
jdd wrote: Jonathan Arson wrote: This absolutely IS SPAM ... anything linking to a link farm is in my book spam ... Now tell me how this user should be allowed to link LINK FARM on opensuse.org on the pretext of doing it in his home dir... any forgiven thing should be noted somewhere.

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread houghi
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:03:35PM -0500, Rajko M wrote: BTW, I didn't click on links, but walk around with copy and paste, to avoid some new inventive way for email and active IP harvesting. 1) How should they be able to learn your email by clicking on a link? 2) What good is IP harvesting? Ik

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread houghi
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:45:20PM +0200, Orn E. Hansen wrote: This isn't kindergarten ... ... that is the reason the OP asked what others were thinking. -- houghi If God doesn't destroy Hollywood Boulevard, he owes Sodom and Gomorrah an apology.

Re: [opensuse-wiki] Would be this spam?

2006-07-16 Thread Orn E. Hansen
söndaginn 16 juli 2006 17:25 skrev houghi: I agree with your point of view, however SPAM does not mean what you say it means. It is not an abrviation. Send Phenominal Amount of Mail, that is it's original meaning. In ancient computer times, 60's, 70's and 80's when network connection was