On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 01:45:32PM +0200, jdd wrote: > Rajko M wrote: > > >In this case problem was that it was personal page, for any other I will > >remove links without thinking a second. The way it is done tells that > >this guy has experience with posting such rubbish to wikies. He posted > >where it will hold the longest, until we discuss the matter. > > > > things may even be worst. Once deleted, the text is not > really deleted but archived (see history). > > > I don't know for sure if the robots can index the oldest > pages (I hope they can't). > > only the site admin can delete entirely the page (or the > history) and this is not trivial AFAIK.
So we come back to what I posted earlier. If you feel there is abuse on a personal page, you inform the webmaster and he should decide what should happen. I could put the source of libdvdcss on my page. That would most likely be removed. I could link to spamsites, should that bve removed? I could link to porn sites. How about those? What about linking to my own site? What if my linking to my personal website is only to get my rankings up? For a personal page, I would prefere it to be inpossible for others to edit it andhave the sysadmin, a comity, the abuse department or some other official(s) decide what should be doe if a complaint comes in for a personal website. For that to be working, there should be rules of what is and what is not allowed on these *personal* pages. -- houghi If God doesn't destroy Hollywood Boulevard, he owes Sodom and Gomorrah an apology. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
