Eric Webb wrote:
Since moving to web application frameworks (jakarta turbine and ww2)
I've exclusively used velocity. I find velocity's syntax to be simple,
clean, and sufficently powerful for constructing views. I mean, when
you get down to it, a view is simply html (in most cases), and
Ok it sounds nice, I'm not against velocity, I'm just curious.
How many hits you are getting per day and peak load?
What hardware and software do you use?
Did you tryed to look at Freemarker, how can you compare Freemarker vs
Velocity.
- Original Message -
From: Rickard Öberg [EMAIL
Rickard Öberg wrote
...
2) Great performance
3) Templates does not have to be in files (JSP files do)
...
where does the performance win over JSPs come from? As JSPs are compiled
into servlets, how do you beat that?
if you don't put your templates into separate files, then where do you
put
--- Erik_Jõgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rickard Öberg wrote
...
2) Great performance
3) Templates does not have to be in files (JSP
files do)
...
where does the performance win over JSPs come from?
As JSPs are compiled
into servlets, how do you beat that?
Did you looked into
http://ejp.sourceforge.net/ - extensible java profiler might work for you.
i don't know any specific tools for web applications.
I think I'm going to do that, but haven't desided yet what profiler to
use.
And I'm not sure which is the best for webApplication profiling. Also it
would be nice
remigijus wrote:
Ok it sounds nice, I'm not against velocity, I'm just curious.
How many hits you are getting per day and peak load?
What hardware and software do you use?
We do load tests sometimes, but it's hard to compare that with reality.
In reality, we do have one web hotel server which
Erik Jõgi wrote:
Rickard Öberg wrote
...
2) Great performance
3) Templates does not have to be in files (JSP files do)
...
where does the performance win over JSPs come from? As JSPs are compiled
into servlets, how do you beat that?
Don't know, don't care. It's just faster :-) That's probably not
- Original Message -
From: Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Velocity vs. JSP
remigijus wrote:
Ok it sounds nice, I'm not against velocity, I'm just curious.
How many hits you are getting per day
I think that's dependent on the servlet container. I know that Orion/oc4j is
much faster than Tomcat with JSPs. If I were forced to use Tomcat, then
velocity would be more compelling.
Personally, I find velocity easier to use because it just seems more focused
to the task at hand with MVC view
A couple of weeks ago I asked this forum on how to implement scripted
Actions in order to speed up development. I received a couple of ideas which
I tried to implement. Unfortunately none of these ideas meet my
requirements. Below is a kind of a small analysis.
Requirement:
Instead of writing
Just started to use velocity instead of JSP and got
first questions.
1. How to set caharacter encoding
2. How can I get array size from the velocity
template.
As I see it looks that freemarker does not have
such problems.
Regards Remis
Default would be the java's default functionality and ScriptedClassLoader
might be used for Groovy classes. Depending on the loader used, the class
attribute will have a different meaning. Issues with this approach:
The script language must be very very similar to Java suppporting objects
and
I'm attaching the Script action from WW1.x... This should probably work
out of the box with WW2, but if someone wants to try it out (and write
some unit tests? :-) ) then we can add it to WW2...
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Donnerstag, Juergen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Think it might just be easier for me to make use of a singleton for
now? If I was using webwork2 on top of xwork I would make use the
components stuff. I really like they way IoC was implemented in webwork!
VisualJeff
At 06:42 PM 2/19/2004 -0800, you wrote:
There are two things you need to
14 matches
Mail list logo
