fix it and retain 1.4 compatibility all
while keeping $webwork.htmlEncode().
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anoop Ranganath
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] escaping text in
version are you using, the
new beta2?
-Original Message-
From: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] escaping text in text fields
We're having an issue with our WW2 application and we're not sur
e escaping them... Which version are you using, the
new beta2?
-Original Message-
From: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] escaping text in text fields
We're having an issue with our WW2 applicatio
It's supposed to be escaping them... Which version are you using, the
new beta2?
> -Original Message-
> From: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OS-webwork] escaping text in text
We're having an issue with our WW2 application and we're not sure
whether it's a bug or a feature.
In a text field, enter ® and click Save once. It returns us to the
form, but now instead of the text ® we see the Registered symbol.
Viewing the source of the web page, shows that it is still sh
I looked at the way 1.3 did it and I'm going to do the same thing --
escaping is always off unless specifically turned on.
- Original Message -
From: "boxed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [O
Pat Lightbody wrote:
That was a typo -- I'd only escape things that didn't have bodies to avoid
that very confusion. What say you?
That sounds fine, although I'm not too keen on the always escape thing
since I won't use it myself. I have my own tranformations I want to do
that are a bit more
Title: Message
:-)
I was
going to lean the opposite way (UI tags don't, URL tag does), but
whichever...
Jason
-Original Message-From: Pat Lightbody
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:33
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[OS-webwork] Esc
That was a typo -- I'd only escape things that didn't have bodies to avoid
that very confusion. What say you?
- Original Message -
From: "boxed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-web
Pat Lightbody wrote:
There are a few open issues with regards to escaping -- none of which
all agree how it should be handled. Some want UI tags to escape, some
want them not to. Some want the URL tag to escape, others don't. I am
leaning towards this:
* UI tags, property, iterate, text, etc
Pat Lightbody wrote:
There are a few open issues with regards to escaping -- none of which
all agree how it should be handled. Some want UI tags to escape, some
want them not to. Some want the URL tag to escape, others don't. I am
leaning towards this:
* UI tags, property, iterate, text, etc
There are a few open issues with regards to
escaping -- none of which all agree how it should be handled. Some want UI tags
to escape, some want them not to. Some want the URL tag to escape, others don't.
I am leaning towards this:
* UI tags, property, iterate, text, etc should all
_escape
12 matches
Mail list logo
