t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] PropertyEditor cache
> I agree that the API is terrible. Is anyone coming up with a better idea
> for Xwork?
>
> Blake
>
> - Original Message -
&g
I agree that the API is terrible. Is anyone coming up with a better idea
for Xwork?
Blake
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 4:39 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] PropertyEditor cache
Yes, agree but I'm trying to say is that a bug ( not thread safe code ? ) that
is suppose to be fix ?
Regards,
Low
--- Rickard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heng Sin Low wrote:
>
> > I remember seeing in a previous post in the list that PropertyEditor is
> being
> > cache inappropriately in BeanUt
Heng Sin Low wrote:
I remember seeing in a previous post in the list that PropertyEditor is being
cache inappropriately in BeanUtil ( not thread safe, I think ). I don't see
anything related to that in the 1.3 changelog or do I miss something here ( Not
an issue after all, may be ) ?
Caching P
Hi all,
I remember seeing in a previous post in the list that PropertyEditor is being
cache inappropriately in BeanUtil ( not thread safe, I think ). I don't see
anything related to that in the 1.3 changelog or do I miss something here ( Not
an issue after all, may be ) ?
Regards,
Low
_
