Re: [Openvpn-devel] Many to one TCP question

2004-04-27 Thread Stephan Scholz
Hi Lonnie, this could already be done with 1.6 by some tweaks and using inetd. I have tried it and it worked fine. Disadvantage: one OpenVPN process per user is created -> memory consumption. In the FAQ on the openvpn homepage, there is a short howto: "How can I implement OpenVPN as a classic, f

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Many to one TCP question

2004-04-27 Thread lonnie
Thanks for the reply to my email on this matter. In reading over the information on the site, I can see what you are talking about and also about the memory consumption because of the many instances, one for each user. In the early Beta 2.0 release notes, it talks about UDP in a "many-to-one" d

[Openvpn-devel] Find programer to develope manage function

2004-04-27 Thread JackyChen
Dear All, Our company are looking for programer to implement OpenVPN Server/Client userfriend manager interface, like CA key integration DB, Key manager, OpenVPN Server/Client configuration UI, etc.. If you are interesting, please contact me Jacky

[Openvpn-devel] Bridging Question

2004-04-27 Thread Lonnie Cumberland
Hello Al, I was looking over the OpenVPN site documentation on the Mini-Bridging HOWTO and came up with a question. It appears that on each side of the VPN that the hubs are allowing got masked IP on the range of 192.189.0.0/24. Since each side is allowing the same range of IP's, doesn't th

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Windows and Shaper

2004-04-27 Thread James Yonan
Derek Burdick said: > I was browsing the online CVS repository and noticed the > config-win32.h.in says that HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY is specified in misc.c. When > I look in misc.c, I don't see the file. Is the latest version just not > checked in? I also implemented a gettimeofday for windows.

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Many to one TCP question

2004-04-27 Thread James Yonan
Lonnie Cumberland said: > Hello All, > > Well, I've been away from the list for a little while and was wondering > if someone could please bring me up to speed on the development of the > "Many-to-One" TCP progress? > > It is my understanding that in the OpenVPN 2.0 (early) Beta, that UDP >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Many to one TCP question

2004-04-27 Thread Lonnie Cumberland
Thanks for replying to my posting on this matter as I am still trying to get clear understanding as to the advantages/disadvantages of using TCP/UDP protocals. My guess is that most things are done via TCP over the Internet and I seem to remember that there are supposed to be many problems wit

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Windows and Shaper

2004-04-27 Thread Derek Burdick
Here is the function. Don't forget to #DEFINE HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY in config-win32.h. Let me know what you think. Derek Burdick - Original Message - From: "James Yonan" To: "Derek Burdick" ; Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 12:48 PM Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Windows and Shaper > Derek

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Many to one TCP question

2004-04-27 Thread Mike Auty
Hi, I have never found any problems using UDP as the tunnel mechanism over the internet. I was under the impression that UDP packets were less likely to be blocked at the firewall than TCP, since historically it has been under utilized. These days with streaming video/media where speed is m

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Many to one TCP question

2004-04-27 Thread James Yonan
Lonnie Cumberland said: > Thanks for replying to my posting on this matter as I am still trying to > get clear understanding as to the advantages/disadvantages of using > TCP/UDP protocals. > > My guess is that most things are done via TCP over the Internet and I > seem to remember that there