Re: [Openvpn-devel] Windows, OpenVPN-GUI, disconnect

2010-03-18 Thread Eike Lohmann
On win7 with baloontips disabled you can connect but can't disconnect via the gui. Maybe that's your problem? Am 18.03.2010 14:17, schrieb Gert Doering: Hi, On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:14:22PM +0100, Jan Just Keijser wrote: took me a while to figure this one out: the openvpn gui codes

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Windows, OpenVPN-GUI, disconnect

2010-03-18 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:14:22PM +0100, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > took me a while to figure this one out: > the openvpn gui codes sets an 'exit event' (using a win32 API call > CreateEvent) before starting the actual openvpn process; when the user > chooses 'disconnect' this 'exit event'

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Windows, OpenVPN-GUI, disconnect

2010-03-18 Thread Jan Just Keijser
Hi Gert, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, can one of you tell me what happens "under the hood" if I click the "disconnect" button of the openvpn-gui under Windows XP? Why am I asking? I managed to get my windows build environment working well enough that I can now build a complete installer package

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Tomorrow's meeting (18th March)

2010-03-18 Thread JuanJo Ciarlante
Hi, 2010/3/17 Samuli Seppänen : > >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:42:26AM +0200, Samuli Seppänen wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> As usual, tomorrow's (18th March) meeting will be at #openvpn-discussion >>> (irc.freenode.net) at 18:00 UTC. Preliminary meeting topics are >>>

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Bytecount Reporting

2010-03-18 Thread Eike Lohmann
Or you can user the radiusplugin from Ralf (http://www.nongnu.org/radiusplugin/) use a radius server and set an accounting interval. Regards, Eike Am 17.03.2010 23:38, schrieb Davide Brini: On Wednesday 17 March 2010, open...@rkmorris.us wrote: I am trying to write an application

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Bytecount Reporting

2010-03-18 Thread Davide Brini
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, open...@rkmorris.us wrote: > Hi Davide, > > > > Yes, that makes sense - and I was going to do that originally, but I > figured the real-time bytecount would result in less traffic (and text > parsing). One question though ... you say "status file". Do you really >