Re: [Openvpn-devel] Compiling OpenVPN for Windows

2010-09-01 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 04:21:53PM +0200, Allan Swanepoel wrote: > > If you use the pre-compiled tun/tap driver from the 2.1.3 windows > > bundle, you don't need the MS DDK/WDK, just msys+mingw and the NSIS > > installer-builder. > > Won't msys & mingw then become dependencies for running

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Compiling OpenVPN for Windows

2010-09-01 Thread Allan Swanepoel
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 02:58:59PM +0200, Allan Swanepoel wrote: >> Hi All, I'm fairly new to building openvpn for windows (have been >> building on Linux since 2.0), >> I have a small customization that I make to

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Compiling OpenVPN for Windows

2010-09-01 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 02:58:59PM +0200, Allan Swanepoel wrote: > Hi All, I'm fairly new to building openvpn for windows (have been > building on Linux since 2.0), > I have a small customization that I make to the openvpn sourcecode to > call external software on initialization, and would

[Openvpn-devel] Compiling OpenVPN for Windows

2010-09-01 Thread Allan Swanepoel
Hi All, I'm fairly new to building openvpn for windows (have been building on Linux since 2.0), I have a small customization that I make to the openvpn sourcecode to call external software on initialization, and would like to build a Windows build with this in. I have ZERO experience in building

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Netmask OpenVPN Server

2010-09-01 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 10:38:01AM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote: > We are working with static assignments and if the 2 networks are side by > side I can recompile the code and define a larger mask. > > We don't have client-2-client and didn't use the ifconfig-pool. In that case, all this

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Netmask OpenVPN Server

2010-09-01 Thread Jan Just Keijser
Hi Eike, Eike Lohmann wrote: We are working with static assignments and if the 2 networks are side by side I can recompile the code and define a larger mask. Is this also working if I have 2 networks far away from each other (10.x and 192.168.x), with defining a 'all your base belong to us'