Hi,
Solaris buildslave failed to test, because "--dev tun" did not work
if tun0 was already in use (didn't hunt to tun1).
Fixed, tested on OpenSolaris 10 / i386 - but the code is straightforward,
so it should work on "standard Solaris" and "sparc" as well. Managed to
get it to hunt to tun2 just
From b5b301591ef0804084bd661d090d36aa44100101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gert Doering
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:35:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] t_client.sh - fix for iproute2, print summary line
Yet another postprocess-output fix for iproute2 (somet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/12 13:41, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote:
>>> Agreed as well..
>> So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the
>> distro"?
>>
> I think this question is r
On 02/06/12 15:03, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Arne Schwabe
> ---
> doc/openvpn.8 |3 ++-
> src/openvpn/options.c |2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied to master.
commit 97235cc7077630004e11d6d44862c3bb7e49a40e
Author: Arne Schwabe
List-
On 02/06/12 15:03, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Arne Schwabe
> ---
> src/openvpn/console.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
Applied to master.
commit 803613de394a0b25374797d001d4a2cdea8b593e
Author: Arne Schwabe
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourcef
On 02/06/12 15:03, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Changes
>
> Options error: option 'dhcp-option' cannot be used in this context
>
> to
>
> P:Options error: option 'dhcp-option' cannot be used in this context
> ([PUSH-OPTIONS])
>
> Signed-off-by: Arne Schwabe
> ---
> src/openvpn/options.c |5 +++-
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote:
>> Agreed as well..
> So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"?
>
I think this question is related to our project policies, not just to
PolarSSL support. Do we want to try to protect packagers and
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote:
> On 7-6-2012 12:25, Gert Doering wrote:
> > So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"?
> 1.1.0 and put the respsonsibility on the distro!
Ok - so I'll ACK the patch Alon has posted as well. Thanks.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/12 11:37, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Repoted-by: Samuli Seppänen Signed-off-by:
> Alon Bar-Lev --- configure.ac |2 +- 1
> files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
Applied to the master branch. I fixed a typo in the commit message
a
On 7-6-2012 12:25, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"?
1.1.0 and put the respsonsibility on the distro!
>
> (How's the work on blowfish going? Only semi-joking, as I'd really like
> to run cross-ssl-library client tests on the buildslav
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote:
> Agreed as well..
So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"?
(How's the work on blowfish going? Only semi-joking, as I'd really like
to run cross-ssl-library client tests on the buildslaves, without
Agreed as well..
On 7-6-2012 11:42, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Frank de Brabander [mailto:braban...@fox-it.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:36
>> To: Samuli Seppänen; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support
I'd go for >= 1.1.4
Since 1.1.2 does not handle empty packets correctly.
On 7-6-2012 11:35, Frank de Brabander wrote:
> Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since there is a
> security issue with versions from 0.99-pre4 up to and including PolarSSL
> 1.1.1.
>
> On 07-06-12 11:24, "S
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:35:58AM +0200, Frank de Brabander wrote:
> Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since there is a
> security issue with versions from 0.99-pre4 up to and including PolarSSL
> 1.1.1.
If the PolarSSL author says so, we should follow :-)
> >I noticed that
Ah, it was an off-by-one, that's why I missed it.
Ack!
Adriaan
> -Original Message-
> From: Samuli Seppänen [mailto:sam...@openvpn.net]
> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:54
> To: Alon Bar-Lev
> Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] build: support
Il 07.06.2012 12:37, Alon Bar-Lev ha scritto:
> Repoted-by: Samuli Seppänen
> Signed-off-by: Alon Bar-Lev
> ---
> configure.ac |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 339164f..9511317 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/c
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Frank de Brabander [mailto:braban...@fox-it.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:36
>> To: Samuli Seppänen; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?
>>
>> Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2,
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank de Brabander [mailto:braban...@fox-it.com]
> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:36
> To: Samuli Seppänen; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?
>
> Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since t
Hello,
Build system should only care about the interface, not the "quality"
of the dependency.
So if we are built OK with >=1.1.0 than this should be the boundary.
Thanks,
Alon.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Frank de Brabander
wrote:
> Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since t
Repoted-by: Samuli Seppänen
Signed-off-by: Alon Bar-Lev
---
configure.ac |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 339164f..9511317 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ if test "${with_crypto_library}"
> -Original Message-
> From: Alon Bar-Lev [mailto:alon.bar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:33
> To: Samuli Seppänen
> Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Samuli Seppänen
> wrote:
Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since there is a
security issue with versions from 0.99-pre4 up to and including PolarSSL
1.1.1.
On 07-06-12 11:24, "Samuli Seppänen" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I noticed that my Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04 buildslaves which had PolarSSL
>1.1.0 failed build duri
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that my Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04 buildslaves which had PolarSSL
> 1.1.0 failed build during the configure phase:
>
> checking polarssl version... configure: error: invalid polarssl version
>
> Updating to PolarSSL 1.1.1 or l
Hi,
I noticed that my Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04 buildslaves which had PolarSSL
1.1.0 failed build during the configure phase:
checking polarssl version... configure: error: invalid polarssl version
Updating to PolarSSL 1.1.1 or later solves this issue. However, commit
1d92d06dca5ac says "Removed su
24 matches
Mail list logo
