On 26/08/15 20:35, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Okay yes. Active FTP is broken by our simple nat implementation. But I
> think FTP, let alone active FTP is dead. I am not sure if we should
> support this in our simple NAT implementation.
I agree. Surely this would be the beginning of a complete beat-up?
Hi JJK,
"client-ip" instead of "localhost" sounds good to me.
BR
Gava
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Jan Just Keijser
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rafael Gava wrote:
>
>>
>> this is my first submission to the list and I hope that I'm doing in the
>> right way. :-)
>>
>>
>> Well,
On 24/08/15 18:54, Boris Lytochkin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Author: Boris Lytochkin
> Sponsored-by: Yandex LLC
>
> Log serial number of revoked certificate
>
> In most of situations admin of OpenVPN server needs to know which
> particular certificate is used by client.
> In
Hi,
Rafael Gava wrote:
this is my first submission to the list and I hope that I'm doing in
the right way. :-)
Well, the features added to Network Address Translator are:
1) Allow the user to use the string "localhost" on the client-nat
network configuration in a way that is not
Hi Arne, thanks for the prompt feedback.
please see comments in-line:
Thanks in advance,
Rafael
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.08.15 um 03:43 schrieb Rafael Gava:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is my first submission to the list and I hope that I'm doing
Am 26.08.15 um 03:43 schrieb Rafael Gava:
> Hi,
>
> this is my first submission to the list and I hope that I'm doing in
> the right way. :-)
>
Yes submitting patches to the list is the preferred way. I haven't
looked in the patch yet. I am first trying to understand the goal of the
patches.
>
Hi,
this is my first submission to the list and I hope that I'm doing in the
right way. :-)
Well, the features added to Network Address Translator are:
1) Allow the user to use the string "localhost" on the client-nat network
configuration in a way that is not necessary to inform the IP