https://sourceforge.net/projects/openvpn/lists/openvpn-devel/unsubscribe
On 26/07/17 18:40, sameer.s.athaley wrote:
Hi could you help.me to remove my mail I'd from mailing list
--
Check out the vibrant tech
Hi could you help.me to remove my mail I'd from mailing list
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
>
> I have no idea what the effect would be ("will it stop doing ethernet
> framing? no more ARP?"), but it's an interesting idea to try.
>
Thanks, seems OpenVPN is not the only VPN client that may recognize this as an
issue and change their iftype.
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 08:50:09AM -0400, Karl Mueller wrote:
> The reason I???m posting this to the Dev list is I???ve no idea what the
> ramifications of changing the iftype, maybe someone???s looked in to this,
> but I haven???t seen any mention on this list about it. It seems reasonable
Hi,
The previous GPG key used to sign our Debian and Ubuntu packages was
bound to expire on 4th August. I extended the lifetime of the key by
three years (26th July 2020).
To prevent apt from complaining after 4th August please do this:
apt-key del E158C569
wget -O -
I’m hoping this is the right place to bring this issue, i’ve had no luck with
searching or bodging a solution on my own, and may need some help with a
slightly-modified TAP adapter driver.
I’m running into an issue between the TAP adapter and Windows 10 ‘soft
disconnect’ behavior for wireless
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 11:16 +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 26/07/17 10:02, David Woodhouse wrote:
> [...snip...]
> >
> >
> > Well yes, that's true. But it's more likely that I'll finally get round
> > to porting OpenVPN to something other than pkcs11-helper before that
> > happens,
On 26/07/17 10:02, David Woodhouse wrote:
[...snip...]
>
> Well yes, that's true. But it's more likely that I'll finally get round
> to porting OpenVPN to something other than pkcs11-helper before that
> happens, unfortunately.
TL;DR: If you or anyone else have a chance to look into this, we
On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 23:56 +0200, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> A single patch would not a a problem for distro maintainers, but
> subsequent/future changes in the forked repository might introduce
> other, less compatible changes in the library, leading to two versions
> of the same library, with
