On Sunday 04 July 2004 04:37, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>Thinking ahead, the challenge/response sequence for passing
> >> authentication info should be open-ended to provide for future
> >> implementation of alternative authentication methods such as Radius,
> >> LDAP, NT Auth, etc.
> >
> > Please don't
> >>Thinking ahead, the challenge/response sequence for passing
> >> authentication info should be open-ended to provide for future
> >> implementation of alternative authentication methods such as Radius,
> >> LDAP, NT Auth, etc.
> >
> > Please don't do too much of that. I've seen this auth featur
James Yonan wrote:
...
Possible client -> server commands:
(1) send auth credentials
(2) get status (as in SIGUSR2)
(3) send signal (SIGHUP, SIGUSR1, or SIGUSR2, SIGTERM)
And server -> client commands:
(1) need auth credentials -- GUI should query the user then return them to the
daemon via
Denis Vlasenko wrote:
On Saturday 03 July 2004 23:01, James Yonan wrote:
management 127.0.0.1 20001
This will cause OpenVPN to listen on 127.0.0.1:20001 as its management
interface port.
It's important, of course, that the management port always be local, since
we are using it to potentially
On Saturday 03 July 2004 23:01, James Yonan wrote:
> management 127.0.0.1 20001
>
> This will cause OpenVPN to listen on 127.0.0.1:20001 as its management
> interface port.
>
> It's important, of course, that the management port always be local, since
> we are using it to potentially pass passwor
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, James Yonan wrote:
There are no hooks as of yet to control a running OpenVPN instance (other
than sending signals).
While I initially thought that named pipes might be the appropriate
channel for this, I'm wondering if if might make more sense (for
portability) to use a loca
On Saturday 03 July 2004 16:40, Mathias Sundman wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, James Yonan wrote:
> > On Saturday 03 July 2004 15:13, Brandon Knitter wrote:
> >> Where do I start? Are the namedpipe hooks into the OpenVPN service
> >> built? I'm not too familiar with named pipes on Windows (done a bi
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, James Yonan wrote:
On Saturday 03 July 2004 15:13, Brandon Knitter wrote:
Where do I start? Are the namedpipe hooks into the OpenVPN service built?
I'm not too familiar with named pipes on Windows (done a bit on *nix), but
I'm sure it can't be too hard. I guess what I'd ne
On Saturday 03 July 2004 15:13, Brandon Knitter wrote:
> Hey there. James and I had a prior discussion about the systray app
> offline, but I thought I'd just poke my head in here. I'm not a strong
> Windows application programmer, but I've been doing a lot of C# these days.
>
> With that in mind
Hey there. James and I had a prior discussion about the systray app offline,
but I thought I'd just poke my head in here. I'm not a strong Windows
application programmer, but I've been doing a lot of C# these days.
With that in mind, I was gonna whip together a quickie little systray app in C#
w
> James, do you put any preferance in what language/environment a gui for
> OpenVPN is developed in, if you would distribute it together with the main
> application in the future?
These are my current thoughts on this:
* Preferably, the language development tools and environment are open source,
Mathias Sundman wrote:
...
No, I'm not used to OO languages, unfortunally. The reasons why I
started to write this in C was:
1) I only know how to code in C, VisualBasic and Assembler. Assembler is
out of the question, and I'm tired of VBs dependency for a bunch of
DLLs. I like beeing able t
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Jan Kiszka wrote:
PS: Has anyone ever thought about some small GUI (taskbar icon with
some dialogs) for Windows, KDE, etc. to make the handling of multiple
configurations and the status display easier in a roadwarrior
scenario?
I just started working on such an applicati
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 11:06, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is a tiny patch to make revoke-crt and make-crl work seamlessly
> within the easy-rsa environment. Seems that no one used it before ;)
Thanks, I've merged for inclusion in beta8.
James
> I would furthermore suggest to discuss the required interface between
> the GUI and the OpenVPN daemon on this list. Starting and stopping would
> be possibly by just running the main binary, but I think a more
> sophisticated status and diagnosis interface requires some other
> mechanism (e.g. a
Mathias Sundman wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Jan Kiszka wrote:
PS: Has anyone ever thought about some small GUI (taskbar icon with
some dialogs) for Windows, KDE, etc. to make the handling of multiple
configurations and the status display easier in a roadwarrior
scenario? Just a thought, I'm
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Jan Kiszka wrote:
PS: Has anyone ever thought about some small GUI (taskbar icon with some
dialogs) for Windows, KDE, etc. to make the handling of multiple
configurations and the status display easier in a roadwarrior scenario? Just
a thought, I'm not saying I have the tim
Hi all,
here is a tiny patch to make revoke-crt and make-crl work seamlessly
within the easy-rsa environment. Seems that no one used it before ;)
Jan
PS: Has anyone ever thought about some small GUI (taskbar icon with some
dialogs) for Windows, KDE, etc. to make the handling of multiple
co
18 matches
Mail list logo
