Hello All,
Well, I've been away from the list for a little while and was wondering
if someone could please bring me up to speed on the development of the
"Many-to-One" TCP progress?
It is my understanding that in the OpenVPN 2.0 (early) Beta, that UDP
connections can be established in a many
Hi Lonnie,
this could already be done with 1.6 by some tweaks and using inetd.
I have tried it and it worked fine.
Disadvantage: one OpenVPN process per user is created -> memory consumption.
In the FAQ on the openvpn homepage, there is a short howto:
"How can I implement OpenVPN as a classic, f
ng on this.
Thanks again,
Lonnie
- Original Message -
From: Stephan Scholz
To: Lonnie Cumberland
Cc: Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 16:12:32 +0200
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Many to one TCP question
Hi Lonnie,
this could already be done with 1.6 by some
Lonnie Cumberland said:
> Hello All,
>
> Well, I've been away from the list for a little while and was wondering
> if someone could please bring me up to speed on the development of the
> "Many-to-One" TCP progress?
>
> It is my understanding that in the OpenVPN 2.0 (early) Beta, that UDP
>
Thanks for replying to my posting on this matter as I am still trying to
get clear understanding as to the advantages/disadvantages of using
TCP/UDP protocals.
My guess is that most things are done via TCP over the Internet and I
seem to remember that there are supposed to be many problems wit
Hi,
I have never found any problems using UDP as the tunnel mechanism over
the internet. I was under the impression that UDP packets were less
likely to be blocked at the firewall than TCP, since historically it has
been under utilized. These days with streaming video/media where speed
is m
Lonnie Cumberland said:
> Thanks for replying to my posting on this matter as I am still trying to
> get clear understanding as to the advantages/disadvantages of using
> TCP/UDP protocals.
>
> My guess is that most things are done via TCP over the Internet and I
> seem to remember that there
