Hi,
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 10:38:01AM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
> We are working with static assignments and if the 2 networks are side by
> side I can recompile the code and define a larger mask.
>
> We don't have client-2-client and didn't use the ifconfig-pool.
In that case, all this
Hi Eike,
Eike Lohmann wrote:
We are working with static assignments and if the 2 networks are side by
side I can recompile the code and define a larger mask.
Is this also working if I have 2 networks far away from each other (10.x
and 192.168.x), with defining a 'all your base belong to us'
We are also using old openvpn clients with windows, there we have to use
/30 netmasks (4 ip's) and can only configure 4096 users.
To handle the load on the machines we build a cluster with dynamic
routing and yes, we are getting close to the /16 network limit.
Am 31.08.2010 13:31, schrieb
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:35:03PM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
In the past only /16 networks were possibel per openvpn instance.
Is it now possibel to define larger networks or define 2x /16 networks
on one openvpn instance?
I assume that you're talking about
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:35:03PM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
> In the past only /16 networks were possibel per openvpn instance.
> Is it now possibel to define larger networks or define 2x /16 networks
> on one openvpn instance?
I assume that you're talking about this error message:
In the past only /16 networks were possibel per openvpn instance.
Is it now possibel to define larger networks or define 2x /16 networks
on one openvpn instance?
Thanks, Eike
