On 27/01/17 08:27, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:02:21AM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> On 26/01/17 19:45, Gert Doering wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:36:32PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
Anyhow ... quick-fix/workaround: Don't use --auth-nocache
>>>
>>>
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:02:21AM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 26/01/17 19:45, Gert Doering wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:36:32PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> >> Anyhow ... quick-fix/workaround: Don't use --auth-nocache
> >
> > What happens if you have --auth-nocache, the
On 26/01/17 19:45, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:36:32PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> Anyhow ... quick-fix/workaround: Don't use --auth-nocache
>
> What happens if you have --auth-nocache, the server sends a token, and
> the token expires? Will the client get some
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:36:32PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> Anyhow ... quick-fix/workaround: Don't use --auth-nocache
What happens if you have --auth-nocache, the server sends a token, and
the token expires? Will the client get something back that it can
understand as "oh, I need to
On 25/01/17 21:28, Scott Crooks wrote:
> Greetings everyone,
>
> I'm doing some testing with moving our current OpenVPN solution to 2.4
> to utilize the benefits of the `auth-gen-token` parameter that was
> recently introduced. I'm a little confused about how it works in
> relation to the `reneg-s
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:28:25PM -0800, Scott Crooks wrote:
> 2. Does having `auth-nocache` on the client side conflict with
> `auth-gen-token` ? Do I need to remove `auth-nocache` from the client side
> to utilize the benefits of `auth-gen-token` ?
As far as I understand (and I have not fo
