Re: [Openvpn-users] DNS Round-robin-records vs. "Preserving recently used remote address"

2024-04-03 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 11:31:03AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt via Openvpn-users wrote: > 2024-02-21 11:37:04 TCP/UDP: Preserving recently used remote address: > [AF_INET]193.175.73.xxx:1194 The code is a bit complex to read and I'm not sure I do understand it (and maybe we broke it at some

Re: [Openvpn-users] DNS Round-robin-records vs. "Preserving recently used remote address"

2024-04-03 Thread Jochen Bern
On 03.04.24 11:31, Ralf Hildebrandt via Openvpn-users wrote: We're using DNS Round-robin-records with a TTL of 300s for our openvpn endpoint servers. Yet, clients seem to reconnect to the same IP, although the DNS entry has expired; the log usually shows something like: 2024-02-21 11:37:04

Re: [Openvpn-users] DNS Round-robin-records vs. "Preserving recently used remote address"

2024-04-03 Thread Marek Zarychta via Openvpn-users
W dniu 3.04.2024 o 11:31, Ralf Hildebrandt via Openvpn-users pisze: Hi! We're using DNS Round-robin-records with a TTL of 300s for our openvpn endpoint servers. Yet, clients seem to reconnect to the same IP, although the DNS entry has expired; the log usually shows something like: 2024-02-21

[Openvpn-users] DNS Round-robin-records vs. "Preserving recently used remote address"

2024-04-03 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt via Openvpn-users
Hi! We're using DNS Round-robin-records with a TTL of 300s for our openvpn endpoint servers. Yet, clients seem to reconnect to the same IP, although the DNS entry has expired; the log usually shows something like: 2024-02-21 11:37:04 TCP/UDP: Preserving recently used remote address: