Re: Graduation?

2009-09-09 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hi Mohammad; Actually there is no reason not to accept your statements, you are totally right! . Why I want to subproject under Geronimo is that its diverse community(including user base) , and stable development activities. Another reason to be subproject is that until to now, we were not so

Re: Graduation?

2009-09-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 on the graduation - I agree with Kevan, that this (little) community is on the right way. Instead of being a sub-project, I'd vote to have OWB becoming a TLP. One reason is that by being standalone it is easier to ensure the project is tied to closely to Geronimo, which makes distribution on

JSR 299 / 330

2009-09-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/rogerk/archive/2009/09/04/contexts-and-dependency-injection-jsr-299-and-glassfish -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Re: JSR 299 / 330

2009-09-09 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Actually we can also blogs/posts/examples. We got very good 2 examples related with JSF. --Gurkan 2009/9/9 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org http://weblogs.java.net/blog/rogerk/archive/2009/09/04/contexts-and-dependency-injection-jsr-299-and-glassfish -- Matthias Wessendorf blog:

Re: JSR 299 / 330

2009-09-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 that would be cool! On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Gurkan Erdogducgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: Actually we can also blogs/posts/examples. We got very good 2 examples related with JSF. --Gurkan 2009/9/9 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org

Re: Graduation?

2009-09-09 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Good point On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org wrote: +1 on the graduation - I agree with Kevan, that this (little) community is on the right way. Instead of being a sub-project, I'd vote to have OWB becoming a TLP. One reason is that by being standalone it

Re: Graduation?

2009-09-09 Thread Sven Linstaedt
-1 from my side. The reasons for being a TLP were already mentioned, especially by Mohammed and Matthias. br, Sven 2009/9/9 Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com Another good point On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at

Re: Graduation?

2009-09-09 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
So this is -1 for being a TLP or for being a Geronimo sub-project :D ? On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Sven Linstaedtsven.linsta...@googlemail.com wrote: -1 from my side. The reasons for being a TLP were already mentioned, especially by Mohammed and Matthias. br, Sven 2009/9/9 Mohammad

Re: Graduation?

2009-09-09 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
So this is -1 for being a TLP or for being a Geronimo sub-project :D ? -1 for both of them? --Gurkan 2009/9/9 Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com So this is -1 for being a TLP or for being a Geronimo sub-project :D ? On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Sven

Re: Graduation?

2009-09-09 Thread Sven Linstaedt
As far as I remember we are counting for being a subproject of Geronimo, aren't we? =) So I suggest OWB being a TLP and not a subproject. br, Sven 2009/9/9 Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com So this is -1 for being a TLP or for being a Geronimo sub-project :D ? On Wed, Sep 9,

Re: Graduation?

2009-09-09 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
:) Thanks Sven; --Gurkan 2009/9/9 Sven Linstaedt sven.linsta...@googlemail.com As far as I remember we are counting for being a subproject of Geronimo, aren't we? =) So I suggest OWB being a TLP and not a subproject. br, Sven 2009/9/9 Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com So

Re: Graduation?

2009-09-09 Thread Mark Struberg
Sorry for repeating myself: I think we should wait for the 330 and 299 specs to settle, and THEN we can decide what to do. I feel uncomfortable with being promoted from incubator without having the API pretty stable. Once this point is reached, I look pretty confident that OWB will find a well

Re: [VOTE][Third Try] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3

2009-09-09 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 looks good. LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/8/09, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: [VOTE][Third Try] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3 To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009,

RE : [VOTE][Third Try] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3

2009-09-09 Thread Monteiro Jean-Louis
Hi all, +1 (if accepted) Samples OK - all run fine Sources - look fine. Good job guys. De : Gurkan Erdogdu [gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com] Date d'envoi : mardi 8 septembre 2009 22:41 À : openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Objet : [VOTE][Third Try]

RE : Graduation?

2009-09-09 Thread Monteiro Jean-Louis
Agree Mohammad. Jean-Louis De : Mohammad Nour El-Din [nour.moham...@gmail.com] Date d'envoi : mercredi 9 septembre 2009 02:11 À : openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Objet : Re: Graduation? -1 Allow me to disagree with you Gurkan, IMHO I think OWN

Re: Graduation?

2009-09-09 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: But it does mean, IMO, that the community has to work on growing and becoming more diverse. I'll note that by my tally, so far in 2009, only two committers have committed code to OpenWebBeans. Admittedly, this does not include code patches.