Hi Mohammad;
Actually there is no reason not to accept your statements, you are totally
right! . Why I want to subproject under Geronimo is that its diverse
community(including user base) , and stable development activities. Another
reason to be subproject is that until to now, we were not so
+1 on the graduation - I agree with Kevan, that this (little)
community is on the right way.
Instead of being a sub-project, I'd vote to have OWB becoming a TLP.
One reason is that by being standalone it is easier to ensure the project is
tied to closely to Geronimo, which makes distribution on
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/rogerk/archive/2009/09/04/contexts-and-dependency-injection-jsr-299-and-glassfish
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Actually we can also blogs/posts/examples. We got very good 2 examples
related with JSF.
--Gurkan
2009/9/9 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/rogerk/archive/2009/09/04/contexts-and-dependency-injection-jsr-299-and-glassfish
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
+1 that would be cool!
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Gurkan Erdogducgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually we can also blogs/posts/examples. We got very good 2 examples
related with JSF.
--Gurkan
2009/9/9 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Good point
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org wrote:
+1 on the graduation - I agree with Kevan, that this (little)
community is on the right way.
Instead of being a sub-project, I'd vote to have OWB becoming a TLP.
One reason is that by being standalone it
-1 from my side.
The reasons for being a TLP were already mentioned, especially by Mohammed
and Matthias.
br, Sven
2009/9/9 Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
Another good point
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at
So this is -1 for being a TLP or for being a Geronimo sub-project :D ?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Sven
Linstaedtsven.linsta...@googlemail.com wrote:
-1 from my side.
The reasons for being a TLP were already mentioned, especially by Mohammed
and Matthias.
br, Sven
2009/9/9 Mohammad
So this is -1 for being a TLP or for being a Geronimo sub-project :D ?
-1 for both of them?
--Gurkan
2009/9/9 Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
So this is -1 for being a TLP or for being a Geronimo sub-project :D ?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Sven
As far as I remember we are counting for being a subproject of Geronimo,
aren't we? =)
So I suggest OWB being a TLP and not a subproject.
br, Sven
2009/9/9 Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
So this is -1 for being a TLP or for being a Geronimo sub-project :D ?
On Wed, Sep 9,
:) Thanks Sven;
--Gurkan
2009/9/9 Sven Linstaedt sven.linsta...@googlemail.com
As far as I remember we are counting for being a subproject of Geronimo,
aren't we? =)
So I suggest OWB being a TLP and not a subproject.
br, Sven
2009/9/9 Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
So
Sorry for repeating myself: I think we should wait for the 330 and 299 specs to
settle, and THEN we can decide what to do. I feel uncomfortable with being
promoted from incubator without having the API pretty stable.
Once this point is reached, I look pretty confident that OWB will find a well
+1
looks good.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 9/8/09, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
Subject: [VOTE][Third Try] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009,
Hi all,
+1 (if accepted)
Samples OK - all run fine
Sources - look fine.
Good job guys.
De : Gurkan Erdogdu [gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com]
Date d'envoi : mardi 8 septembre 2009 22:41
À : openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Objet : [VOTE][Third Try]
Agree Mohammad.
Jean-Louis
De : Mohammad Nour El-Din [nour.moham...@gmail.com]
Date d'envoi : mercredi 9 septembre 2009 02:11
À : openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Objet : Re: Graduation?
-1
Allow me to disagree with you Gurkan, IMHO I think OWN
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
But it does mean, IMO, that the community has to work on growing and
becoming more diverse. I'll note that by my tally, so far in 2009,
only two committers have committed code to OpenWebBeans. Admittedly,
this does not include code patches.
16 matches
Mail list logo