Hi,
is it possible that the current trunk is _eating_ JSF 2.0 annotations ?
someCode
...
import javax.faces.bean.ManagedBean;
import javax.faces.bean.SessionScoped;
@ManagedBean(name=playersBean)
@SessionScoped
public class ViewParamsBean
{
...
/someCode
In June (before reflecting the
It must not eat.
But one point,
You still use old XML configuration file format. As a default OWB uses new
XML format. Add
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/guess/src/main/resources/META-INF/openwebbeans/openwebbeans.properties
in your project
,
strub
--- On Wed, 8/26/09, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: WebBeans eating JSF 2.0 annotations ?
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 5:11 PM
has no effect. The beast can't find
: WebBeans eating JSF 2.0 annotations ?
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 5:11 PM
has no effect. The beast can't find
the JSF beans.
Due to lack of time, I am going with JSF 2.0 standalone.
Question is: as it was working the current behavior
in the
webbeans-jsf module and let OWB do all the resolving.
wdyt?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 8/26/09, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: WebBeans eating JSF 2.0 annotations ?
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date
! :-) )
Are you able to bring this dilemma up on some EG ?
(mismatch of all the stuff)
-Matthias
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 8/26/09, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: WebBeans eating JSF 2.0 annotations ?
To: openwebbeans
: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: WebBeans eating JSF 2.0 annotations ?
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 5:26 PM
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:23 PM,
Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Mark
wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: WebBeans eating JSF 2.0 annotations ?
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 5:45 PM
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Mark
Strubergstrub...@yahoo.de
wrote:
In fact we (OWB) should provide
, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: WebBeans eating JSF 2.0
annotations ?
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 5:26 PM
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:23 PM,
Matthias Wessendorfmat
container in SE land. Which is the base for every damn thing.
-Matthias
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 8/26/09, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: WebBeans eating JSF 2.0 annotations ?
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
has there been any testing on OBW + JSF 2.0 ?
No. But will try.
--Gurkan
2009/8/26 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
has no effect. The beast can't find the JSF beans.
Due to lack of time, I am going with JSF 2.0 standalone.
Question is: as it was working the current behavior is a
or from within eclipse?
I know that m2eclipse handles the classpath providing a bit
different...
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 8/26/09, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: WebBeans eating JSF 2.0 annotations ?
To: openwebbeans-dev
eating JSF 2.0 annotations ?
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 6:10 PM
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Mark
Strubergstrub...@yahoo.de
wrote:
Matze,
I think this would all become ok if _all_ the EE6
parts will simply use the JSR-330 javax.inject.Scope
13 matches
Mail list logo
