Re: project site deployment
Great Mark!, I will do in the evening;
Thanks;
/Gurkan
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 1:50:58 AM
Subject: project site deployment
Hi Gurkan!
Can you please write-allow the group on /www/incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans?
Otherwise I wont be able to do a site deployment ;)
I btw had an idea about how we could be future safe:
/www/incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans
|- openwebbeans
| |- 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
| |- 1.0.0-M1
|
|- openwebbeans-impl
| |- 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
| |- 1.0.0-M1
|
|- openwebbeans-api
| |- 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
| |- 1.0.0-M1
|
|- samples
...
All sites are automatically deployed to
./${project.artifactId}/${project.version}
and the main directory only contains an index.html with a redirect to the
actual version of the parent poms site.
LieGrue,
strub
[jira] Created: (OWB-61) Refactor the annotations to match the new package schema.
Refactor the annotations to match the new package schema. - Key: OWB-61 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-61 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu Gavin changed the final public review spec in a way that we don't have all WebBeans annotations in javax.webbeans anymore. Instead we now have the following packages: javax.context javax.inject javax.inject.manager javax.event See appendix C of the spec for the details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (OWB-62) Refactor web-beans.xml to beans.xml
Refactor web-beans.xml to beans.xml --- Key: OWB-62 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-62 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu The term WebBeans has completely removed from the final PR spec and also the xml config files name has changed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: M1-Release Content
Hi folks! Before we click on the red button finally, I'd like to ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? Gavin today published the public review draft of the spec, and it contains a lot of changes which do change WebBeans a lot. e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. Do we really like to release M1 today? Or should we better take 2 days, read through the final spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the package changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. Otoh we could try how good our release process works already ;) WDYT? LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com schrieb am Do, 22.1.2009: Von: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Datum: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009, 19:48 Hi, Do not worry Mohammad, we know that the open source is the volenteer process. You are always welcome whenever you have time to help to the OpenWebBeans! Thanks a lot; Cheers; /Gurkan From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 5:59:58 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content I am thinking after having the Vote over M1 approved that I start working on M2 beside JIRA for sure. I just want you to know that I am not totally free for oss development. I only do whatever I can in my free time :-). I mean I hope your not sad of not working on the former items :-). On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Mohammad, yeap I did this stuff. You could look for the jira for any further issues :) thanks; Gurkan From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 2:02:17 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Sorry but now I don't understand I thought that all the points in the list are not implemented yet, it seems that I undertsood wrong. Is there anything else I can do, I may have time during this weekend. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote: All done ? On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Its done. /Gurkan From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 8:56:41 AM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Ok, Mohammad. Thanks; /Gurkan From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 11:19:24 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Hey Gurkan... No not really I have been too busy at work :-( . I will start work on the issues as soon as I have some free time. If you started to work on them please let me know so I work on free issues. On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hey Mohammad; Is there any progress on this issue :) ? Thanks; /Gurkan From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 7:11:43 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Oh sorry :-) you mean the items listed in the quoted text of this thread :-) right ? anyway I will start working on them as much as I can and I will send you a mail on Sunday to tell what I have done of them. On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Gurkan... Sorry but what Items you are referring to ? On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Mohammad, Could you do anything about the following items? If not I will start to finish them. I wish that we are able to ready at start of the next week for M1-Release VOTE ? Thanks; Hi Gurkan... I noticed that from the SCM mails :-). I will check the mails for any other required items. On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Mohammad; I attacked the two of them in the late night :) 1* I added the *licences* directory for binary distribution of the project. You can reach all the distribution related stuffs under the */distribution* directory. 2* I changed the artifact names of the *webbeans-api* and *webbeans-impl* to *openwebbeans-api* and *openwebbeans-impl* Its great that you can start any other items. Thanks a lot; /Gurkan From: Mohammad Nour El-Din
[jira] Commented: (OWB-24) Producer Field Implementation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1249#action_1249 ] Mark Struberg commented on OWB-24: -- the use cases for @Target(METHOD) : @Produces public static String foo = foo; @Produces static Integer bar = 1; @Produces static String johnDoe = getUnknownAuthor(); Producer Field Implementation - Key: OWB-24 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-24 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Task Components: Core Reporter: Gurkan Erdogdu Fix For: M2 Adding of the producer field components. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: M1-Release Content
+1 Mark. As Mark said, it is good idea to read the PDR in the weekend and puts all the issues that we do not handle so far into the jira. I am thinking about the server integration point. Because the specification removes the plug-in functionality. How do we handle this ? How do we integrate the OpenWebBeans with Geronimo ? Currently, OpenWebBeans supports the WAR deployment via ServletContextListener as a plugin functionality. In this scenario, we are scanning the WAR archive to setup the initial Manager(activity) via listener. Currently we do not support for the EJB's. I have looked at the WebBeansScanner class today, the EJB scanning seems to be implemented wrongly. As Mark indicated before, we could create a another module for EJB integration. What do you think about integration code? How can we start this? Maybe we can talk about it after reading the spec. this weekend. And what do you think about the date of the M1-Release and M1-Release Content that I have sent before? Thanks; /Gurkan From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:24:37 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Hi folks! Before we click on the red button finally, I'd like to ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? Gavin today published the public review draft of the spec, and it contains a lot of changes which do change WebBeans a lot. e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. Do we really like to release M1 today? Or should we better take 2 days, read through the final spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the package changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. Otoh we could try how good our release process works already ;) WDYT? LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com schrieb am Do, 22.1.2009: Von: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Datum: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009, 19:48 Hi, Do not worry Mohammad, we know that the open source is the volenteer process. You are always welcome whenever you have time to help to the OpenWebBeans! Thanks a lot; Cheers; /Gurkan From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 5:59:58 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content I am thinking after having the Vote over M1 approved that I start working on M2 beside JIRA for sure. I just want you to know that I am not totally free for oss development. I only do whatever I can in my free time :-). I mean I hope your not sad of not working on the former items :-). On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Mohammad, yeap I did this stuff. You could look for the jira for any further issues :) thanks; Gurkan From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 2:02:17 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Sorry but now I don't understand I thought that all the points in the list are not implemented yet, it seems that I undertsood wrong. Is there anything else I can do, I may have time during this weekend. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote: All done ? On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Its done. /Gurkan From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 8:56:41 AM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Ok, Mohammad. Thanks; /Gurkan From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 11:19:24 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Hey Gurkan... No not really I have been too busy at work :-( . I will start work on the issues as soon as I have some free time. If you started to work on them please let me know so I work on free issues. On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hey Mohammad; Is there any progress on this issue :) ? Thanks; /Gurkan From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 7:11:43 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Oh sorry :-) you mean the items listed in the quoted text of this thread :-) right ? anyway I will start working on them as much as I can and I will send you a mail on Sunday to tell
Re: M1-Release Content
I have created a jira ticket for M1-Release, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-63. Please add your comments about the M1-Release into this issue. From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 10:05:47 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content I think in the M1-Release we just support the ServletContextListener scanning, it is fine for me. But this requires the developer to configure OpenWebBeans related artifacts in his web.xml file of the application. After the M1 release it is good idea to integrate WAR scanning via Geronimo WAR deployment integration. So Geronimo users can benefit from the Webbeans functionality. After this integration is done successfully, we can further integrate other points like EJB, JMS etc. Kevan : How could we start to integrate the our WAR scanning to discover deployed webbeans classes with Geronimo WAR deployment? Do we have to provide some sort of SPI that the Geronimo implements ? Our aim is that when the user deploys war archive into the Geronimo, if this WAR archive contains WEB-INF/beans.xml file (or classpath libraries with theirs META-INF/beans.xml ), it automatically provides the webbeans functionality without the configuring the any other details. Moreover, Geronimo must add the OpenWebBeans specific listeners, filters etc. to the deployment. Thanks; /Gurkan From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:48:54 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content I'm not sure if the change for the Integration part in the PDR is kind of 'politically' caused. Since JBoss is a J2EE and there was not much time for Gavin to finish the PDR, it was maybe simply the easiest way to get the spec finished. Sure it makes EJB and JMS integration a lot easier, but then there are other scenarios where EJB and JMS is not required at all. So for me I'd prefer to still have 2 ways to get OpenWebBeans running: 1.) with Geronimo in an J2EE environment where we provide the full EJB and JMS integration 2.) SE with a ServletContextListener running on a simple webserver like tomcat or jetty + MyFaces + OpenJPA, which would be THE killer criteria to be competitive with Spring! LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com schrieb am Fr, 23.1.2009: Von: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Datum: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009, 20:37 +1 Mark. As Mark said, it is good idea to read the PDR in the weekend and puts all the issues that we do not handle so far into the jira. I am thinking about the server integration point. Because the specification removes the plug-in functionality. How do we handle this ? How do we integrate the OpenWebBeans with Geronimo ? Currently, OpenWebBeans supports the WAR deployment via ServletContextListener as a plugin functionality. In this scenario, we are scanning the WAR archive to setup the initial Manager(activity) via listener. Currently we do not support for the EJB's. I have looked at the WebBeansScanner class today, the EJB scanning seems to be implemented wrongly. As Mark indicated before, we could create a another module for EJB integration. What do you think about integration code? How can we start this? Maybe we can talk about it after reading the spec. this weekend. And what do you think about the date of the M1-Release and M1-Release Content that I have sent before? Thanks; /Gurkan From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:24:37 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Hi folks! Before we click on the red button finally, I'd like to ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? Gavin today published the public review draft of the spec, and it contains a lot of changes which do change WebBeans a lot. e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. Do we really like to release M1 today? Or should we better take 2 days, read through the final spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the package changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. Otoh we could try how good our release process works already ;) WDYT? LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com schrieb am Do, 22.1.2009: Von: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Datum: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009, 19:48 Hi, Do not worry Mohammad, we know that the open source is the volenteer process. You are always welcome whenever you have time to help to the OpenWebBeans! Thanks a lot;
kevan hands out gold stars
Since I was thinking about this, I thought I'd go ahead and send a note. I think you guys are off to a really good start. You're making a lot of really good progress with the implementation. The release preparation, although potentially delayed for a bit (which is not a bad thing at all), has gone very well. Most importantly, I'm very pleased by the amount of communication that I'm seeing. Keep up the good work! You all deserve a pat on the back this weekend, while reading the updated spec, of course... :-P --kevan
Re: M1-Release Content
Just to be sure -- that should say something like do we really like to create an M1 release candidate to vote on, today? Yes, sorry my phrasing was misleading. LieGrue, strub --- Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com schrieb am Fr, 23.1.2009: Von: Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Datum: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009, 21:36 On Jan 23, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi folks! Before we click on the red button finally, I'd like to ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? Gavin today published the public review draft of the spec, and it contains a lot of changes which do change WebBeans a lot. e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. Do we really like to release M1 today? Just to be sure -- that should say something like do we really like to create an M1 release candidate to vote on, today? Or should we better take 2 days, read through the final spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the package changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. Otoh we could try how good our release process works already ;) WDYT? I have no problem either way. It sounds prudent to allow some time for everyone to review the new spec and then make the decision. I'm guessing that you'll probably want to make updates to rapidly match the new spec. --kevan
Re: [jira] Created: (OWB-62) Refactor web-beans.xml to beans.xml
Doesn't this make conflict with Spring bean.xml ? it looks like it is in Spring roadmap to become a light weight EJB 3.1 container, it may be possible in future that both web-beans and spring containers are allowed together. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Mark Struberg (JIRA) j...@apache.orgwrote: Refactor web-beans.xml to beans.xml --- Key: OWB-62 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-62 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu The term WebBeans has completely removed from the final PR spec and also the xml config files name has changed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. -- Arash Rajaeeyan
