For me its ok. Good stuff Mark!
Its great to have mavenize versioned web site now :)
Thanks;
/Gurkan
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 1:47:52 PM
Subject: first version of mvn
Hi Arash;
We will just apply the specification requirements.
Thanks;
/Gurkan
From: Arash Rajaeeyan arash.rajaee...@gmail.com
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:28:03 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (OWB-62) Refactor
But Aresh is right.
So as we have to fulfil the spec (which really requires beans.xml now) and
also like to be applicable for a lot of situations, we may add a kind of
OpenWebBeansConfiguration class which reads this name (and maybe a few other
settings in the future) form an
Thanks a lot to Kevan and our mentors for helping us about every problems that
we run across :)
In the mean time, we really want to release our M1 in next Friday finally.
/Gurkan
From: Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
To:
Hi!
I'd like to know how we should cope with features we implement in OpenWebBeans
which are _not_ specified in JSR-299 but are quite handy to have.
1.) Do we like to have such 'additional features' at all?
I'd say yes, e.g. the injection of java primitives and wrappers for
constructors and
For me ,content is looking good Mark. But do we have to put such a content
before the implementation contains those futures ?
I think that firstly we have to order our priorities for the jira tasks that
are waiting to be solved. Currently, there are two milstone versions, namely M1
and M2 in
Gurkan, you are absolutely right that there is currently no need to force such
features.
But on the other hand, there will be the point when we will like to add one or
the others of them. And since I'm a little forgetfully, I better write things
down immediately ;)
LieGrue,
strub
---
+1 I have to second that. Funny is I though the same, before I read it.
-M
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Since I was thinking about this, I thought I'd go ahead and send a note.
I think you guys are off to a really good start. You're making a lot
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/RevisedPublicDraftOfJSR299JavaContextsAndDependencyInjection
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
There was a long discussion about how to name the baby finally, and I honestly
have to admit: maybe I'm to dumb to understand, but the now chosen name is a)
not handy as a buzzphrase and b) exactly non_meaningful as the original one.
So I'd suggest to at least keep our projects name as
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
There was a long discussion about how to name the baby finally, and I
honestly have to admit: maybe I'm to dumb to understand, but the now chosen
name is a) not handy as a buzzphrase and b) exactly non_meaningful as the
+1
/Gurkan
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 9:35:46 AM
Subject: AW: WebBeans is dead. Long live the JSR 299
There was a long discussion about how to name the baby finally, and I
Ok, Mark :) You would also create the jira tickets for features under
the release version (M1or M2 ..M5) you think that will provide these
functionalities.
Thanks;
/Gurkan
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
nice idea mark
we can also discuss this in specification list,
this is the benefit of parallel implementation of spec in Apache,
they may not notice (or don't care about!) some existing problems,
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
But Aresh is right.
So as
arash, can you please post your findings on the spec list?
txs,
strub
--- Arash Rajaeeyan arash.rajaee...@gmail.com schrieb am Sa, 24.1.2009:
Von: Arash Rajaeeyan arash.rajaee...@gmail.com
Betreff: Re: [jira] Created: (OWB-62) Refactor web-beans.xml to beans.xml
An:
Hi!
I've now deployed an updated maven site generation to
http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
It will be available in ~30 minutes, depending on the rsync schedule.
It is far from being prefect, but at least this is now the first version I
don't have to be
Congratulation Mark!.
I think that license file is enough. I looked at some other top level
projects, they are contains the LICENSE file. I did not see the NOTICE file.
Thanks;
/Gurkan
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To:
17 matches
Mail list logo
