can we assume ordinary java objects also have a place on JNDI tree?
just as EJB 3.1 components names have become standard?
that's some thing we can propose to be added web-beans (Java Dependency
Injection) standard.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi!
The (EJB centric) Spec of @Resource says that the resource will always be
looked up via JNDI [1]. I guess mainly because the whole J2EE stuff is really
JNDI centric.
Otoh in environments where no or only a
schrieb am Fr, 13.3.2009:
Von: Arash Rajaeeyan arash.rajaee...@gmail.com
Betreff: Re: @Resource handling
An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Datum: Freitag, 13. März 2009, 10:03
can we assume ordinary java objects
also have a place on JNDI tree?
just as EJB 3.1 components names
